vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White wins on stability and price, Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide wins on popularity and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior stability and shock absorption, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels in cushioning and fit. Choose based on your running needs.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is $5.50 cheaper than Brooks.

Stability

Gel-Kayano 32 provides better stability for long-distance running.

Shock Absorption

Rearfoot PureGEL technology is 65% softer than standard GEL.

Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better

Cushioning

Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for enhanced cushioning.

Popularity

Brooks has a better bestseller rank of 2293.

Inclusive Fit

Ghost Max 3 accommodates orthotics and offers a more inclusive fit.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White
85
Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteBrooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
BrandASICSBrooks
Price$154.45$159.95
Sales Rank38052293
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshNylon
Midsole TechnologyFF BLAST™ PLUSDNA LOFT V3

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteBrooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes vs. Brooks Women Ghost Max 3

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes and Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 are two highly regarded running shoes, each designed with unique features to enhance comfort and performance. The Gel-Kayano 32 is priced at $154.45, making it about 3% cheaper than the Ghost Max 3, which retails for $159.95. With their respective bestseller ranks of 3805 and 2293, both shoes have garnered attention, but the Ghost Max 3 is currently the more popular choice among consumers.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 features a sleek and breathable engineered mesh upper, which is not only lightweight but also minimizes the need for additional overlays. Its colorway, inspired by the golden hour, adds a unique aesthetic appeal. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 showcases a sporty style with a color combination of black and rose gold, enhancing its visual appeal. Both shoes are designed with functionality in mind, but the Gel-Kayano 32's focus on airflow may offer an advantage during warmer runs.

Comfort and Fit

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 emphasizes comfort with its innovative 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM feature, which provides adaptive stability for a balanced stride. Additionally, the shoe includes a knit heel pull tab that aids in easy wearability. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is designed with a high stack nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3, which enhances cushioning and comfort. The unique construction of the Ghost Max 3 also allows for a more inclusive fit, accommodating those who may require orthotics. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the Gel-Kayano 32 may offer a more tailored experience for distance runners.

Performance and Stability

Performance-wise, the Gel-Kayano 32 is equipped with the 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION feature, which improves compression at footstrike and caters to different running gaits. This makes it particularly effective for long-distance runners seeking stability. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3's nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 foam provides a soft underfoot feel, which can enhance performance during shorter runs. While both shoes excel in their respective areas, the Gel-Kayano 32 may be better suited for those prioritizing stability over cushioning.

Technology and Features

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is loaded with advanced technology, including Rearfoot PureGEL technology that is about 65% softer compared to standard GEL technologies. This feature is designed to absorb shock and improve comfort during runs. Conversely, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 incorporates a rubber outsole and EVA insole, providing durability and responsiveness. While both shoes boast impressive technology, the Gel-Kayano 32's focus on shock absorption may give it an edge for those who run on harder surfaces.

Price and Value

In terms of pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is available for $154.45, which is approximately $5.50 less than the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 priced at $159.95. This 3% price difference may appeal to budget-conscious consumers looking for quality without compromising on performance. Given the features each shoe offers, the Gel-Kayano 32 presents a solid value for runners looking for stability and comfort at a slightly lower price point.

Popularity and Sales Rank

The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 has a bestseller rank of 2293, indicating that it is currently more popular among consumers compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32, which holds a rank of 3805. This difference in popularity may suggest that users favor the Ghost Max 3 for its inclusive fit and overall comfort. However, bestseller rank can fluctuate based on seasonal trends and promotions, so it’s important to consider personal needs and preferences when choosing between these two models.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and preferences. If you prioritize stability, shock absorption, and a slightly lower price, the Gel-Kayano 32 may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you seek enhanced cushioning and a more inclusive fit, the Ghost Max 3 could be the superior choice. Both shoes offer excellent features and comfort, making them worthy contenders in the running shoe market.