ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White wins on weight and stability, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on waterproof and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers a lightweight and stable option at a lower price, while the Brooks Women's Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX provides waterproof protection for wet conditions.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Price
ASICS is $10.55 cheaper
Weight
ASICS is lighter with a breathable design
Stability
ASICS features advanced stability technology
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Waterproof
Brooks has GORE-TEX waterproof protection
Cushioning
Brooks offers DNA LOFT v2 cushioning
Support
Brooks has GUIDERAILS for motion control
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Price | $154.45 | $165.00 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Waterproof | No | Yes |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST™ PLUS | DNA LOFT v2 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes and Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are priced at $154.45, making them about 7% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, which retails for $165.00. Both shoes are designed for runners seeking comfort and support, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The Gel-Kayano 32 is known for its lightweight construction and advanced stability features, while the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers a waterproof option ideal for varying weather conditions.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort and fit, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 shines with its engineered mesh upper that provides breathability and reduces the need for additional overlays. This design is complemented by a knit heel pull tab for easy on-and-off wear. The shoes also feature a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to your foot's movement, ensuring stability throughout your run. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX employs a dynamic cushioning system with DNA LOFT v2 for a soft ride, but it also includes a GORE-TEX upper for waterproof protection, making it slightly bulkier.
Performance Features
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates the 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION feature, which enhances compression at footstrike, allowing for a softer feel underfoot. This technology is beneficial for runners who require a responsive shoe that caters to individual gait differences. On the other hand, the Brooks Women's Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features the GUIDERAILS HOLISTIC SUPPORT SYSTEM, designed to align the body in its natural motion path while controlling excess movement. This can be particularly advantageous for runners needing additional support during long distances.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is currently priced at $154.45, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is priced at $165.00. This means that the Gel-Kayano 32 is about 7% cheaper. If budget is a significant factor in your decision-making process, the ASICS model offers a more affordable option without compromising on essential running shoe features.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is part of the SUNNY SIZZLE Collection, featuring vibrant colors inspired by sunrises and sunsets. Its lightweight sublimated upper mesh is designed for breathability, making it visually appealing for runners who value style. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX comes in a striking black, knockout pink, and aqua color scheme, which is both functional and stylish. The waterproof GORE-TEX upper keeps the shoe looking fresh despite exposure to the elements.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is crucial when investing in running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is constructed with a reinforced tongue wing for added comfort and support during long runs. While exact longevity data isn't provided, the brand's reputation for quality suggests that these shoes will hold up well under extensive use. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, with its waterproof GORE-TEX technology, also promises durability against weather elements, making it a solid choice for those who frequently run in rainy conditions.
Ideal Usage Scenarios
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is perfect for runners who prioritize comfort and stability over longer distances. Its advanced features make it suitable for various running environments, particularly in warmer weather. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX excels in providing waterproof protection, making it ideal for runners who need a reliable shoe in wet conditions or for those who engage in cross-training activities.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you are looking for a lightweight, stable shoe that is about 7% cheaper, the Gel-Kayano 32 is an excellent choice. However, if you often run in wet conditions and need a shoe with waterproof capabilities, the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX may be worth the additional investment for its superior protection. Both shoes offer unique features tailored to different running experiences, making each a strong contender in the running shoe market.

