ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White wins on comfort and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on weight.
The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior stability and advanced features for serious runners, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is a budget-friendly option for everyday use.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Performance
ASICS has advanced stability features.
Brand Reputation
ASICS is more recognized in the running community.
Comfort
ASICS provides better adaptive stability.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
New Balance is suitable for various activities.
Weight
New Balance is lighter for casual wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST™ PLUS | Fresh Foam |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Knit Upper |
| Drop | N/A | 8 mm |
| Sales Rank | 3805 | 13745 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Ultra-light |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are priced at $154.45, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $69.99. This makes the New Balance model approximately 55% less expensive than the ASICS. For those on a budget or looking for a value option, the Fresh Foam 680 V8 clearly stands out. However, the price difference also reflects the varying features and technologies incorporated in each shoe, making it essential to consider what you're paying for beyond just the cost.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 features a sleek black and white color scheme with a gradient spray inspired by sunrise and sunset colors. This shoe is part of the SUNNY SIZZLE Collection, which emphasizes a vibrant aesthetic. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 sports a more understated appearance with a precision-engineered knit upper that provides a sleek fit. While ASICS offers a more colorful and visually striking option, New Balance leans towards a minimalist design that some may find more versatile for daily wear.
Comfort and Fit
The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 is designed with a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides adaptive stability and comfort, while also featuring FF BLAST™ PLUS foam for a smoother running experience. The knit heel pull tab and the engineered mesh upper contribute to its overall comfort. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 focuses on ultra-cushioned comfort with its Fresh Foam midsole, designed for a lightweight ride. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the ASICS model offers additional stability features, which may appeal to runners seeking that extra support during long runs.
Performance and Technology
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates cutting-edge technologies like the 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION feature, which caters to different gait patterns and enhances compression at footstrike. This model also features a rearfoot PureGEL technology, offering a softer feel compared to standard GEL tech. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 boasts a bio-based content in its midsole foam, which is designed for an ultra-cushioned ride. While both shoes promise excellent performance, the ASICS model is tailored more toward serious runners looking for stability and support, while the New Balance shoe shines in everyday comfort.
Durability and Construction
Durability is a crucial factor for running shoes, and both brands have designed their models with this in mind. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 uses a lightweight, breathable mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, potentially increasing its longevity. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 also utilizes a no-sew construction method for a sleek fit, which may enhance durability by reducing points of wear. Overall, both shoes are built to withstand regular use, but the advanced materials in the ASICS may offer a slight edge in terms of long-term durability for dedicated runners.
Versatility
The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is marketed as an all-purpose running shoe, suitable for everything from daily runs to casual errands. Its cushioned design and lightweight nature make it an appealing choice for various activities. Meanwhile, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 is more specialized for distance running, offering features that cater to serious athletes. While both shoes can be worn in everyday settings, those seeking a versatile shoe for multiple activities may find the New Balance model to be a better fit.
Brand Reputation
ASICS has a long-standing reputation in the running community, often recognized for their high-quality performance shoes. The Gel-Kayano series has consistently ranked well in sales, currently holding a bestseller rank of 3805. New Balance, while also reputable, has a slightly lower sales rank of 13745 for the Fresh Foam 680 V8, indicating less popularity among serious runners. This difference in brand reputation may influence a consumer's choice, particularly for those who value proven performance and community endorsement.
Which should you buy?
The choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for a specialized, high-performance running shoe with advanced features for stability and support, the ASICS model is worth the investment despite its higher price of $154.45. However, if you prefer a more budget-friendly option that still delivers comfort and versatility for everyday use, the New Balance shoe at $69.99 offers significant savings and solid performance.

