ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White wins on stability and comfort, New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running wins on weight and price.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels in stability and comfort, while the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 offers a lightweight, responsive experience. Choose based on your running style.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Stability
Superior support for long-distance running
Comfort
FF BLAST™ PLUS foam for a smoother experience
Durability
Rearfoot PureGEL technology enhances longevity
Why New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running is better
Weight
Lightweight design for speed
Responsiveness
FuelCell foam provides a propulsive feel
Price
More affordable option at $144.95
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Model | Gel-Kayano 32 | FuelCell Rebel V5 |
| Price | $154.45 | $144.95 |
| Sales Rank | 3805 | 24349 |
| Upper Material | Engineered mesh | FantomFit |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is priced at $154.45, while the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 is about 17% cheaper at $144.95. Both shoes are designed for runners, but they cater to different preferences in terms of support and responsiveness. The Gel-Kayano 32 is known for its stability and comfort, making it a strong contender for long-distance runners. In contrast, the FuelCell Rebel V5 focuses on a propulsive feel, ideal for those looking to add speed to their training sessions.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels with features like the FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole, designed for a smooth running experience. Additionally, its engineered mesh upper ensures breathability, which is key during warmer runs. The New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5, while also comfortable, emphasizes a lightweight design with its FantomFit upper, offering bonded support that is ultra-light. Both shoes provide great comfort, but the Gel-Kayano 32's focus on stability may appeal more to those who prioritize support over a lightweight feel.
Performance Features
The performance features of the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 include the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability, crucial for distance runners. It helps maintain a balanced stride, particularly during long runs. The FuelCell Rebel V5, on the other hand, utilizes FuelCell foam to deliver a responsive underfoot experience, making it suitable for faster-paced workouts. While both shoes support performance, the Gel-Kayano 32 targets stability, while the FuelCell Rebel V5 focuses on propulsion, catering to different running styles.
Weight and Agility
The weight of a running shoe can significantly influence performance, and here the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 has an advantage with its lightweight design. This shoe is built for speed, allowing for quick transitions during training. In contrast, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is not excessively heavy, it is designed with more cushioning and support in mind, which may slightly hinder agility. Runners looking for a shoe to aid in speed may find the FuelCell Rebel V5 more appealing.
Durability
Both the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 are made with materials intended for durability, but they serve different purposes. The Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates a rearfoot PureGEL technology, which enhances durability while providing a softer feel underfoot. Meanwhile, the FuelCell Rebel V5 features a geometric midsole that extends wider than its predecessor, which contributes to its overall resilience. Runners expecting to put in many miles may find the Gel-Kayano 32's durability particularly reassuring, especially for longer distances.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetic appeal can be subjective, but the styles of both shoes are distinctly attractive. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 sports a vibrant Black/White colorway, representing the SUNNY SIZZLE Collection, designed to evoke the colors of sunrise and sunset. The New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5, with its Linen/Grey Matter/White palette, offers a more understated look that still retains a sporty edge. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference in style.
Price and Value
At $154.45, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is priced higher than the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5, which retails for $144.95. This difference of about $9.50 could be a determining factor for budget-conscious buyers. The Gel-Kayano 32's features justify its higher price for those in need of extra stability and support during long runs. However, for those seeking a responsive, lightweight shoe, the FuelCell Rebel V5 offers excellent value, especially given its performance-focused design.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 ultimately depends on your running style and needs. If you require superior stability and support for long-distance runs, the Gel-Kayano 32 is the better choice, despite its higher price point. Conversely, if you're looking for a lightweight shoe that emphasizes speed and responsiveness, the FuelCell Rebel V5 is a solid option, especially at the lower price of $144.95. Each shoe offers unique benefits, catering to different types of runners, so your personal running goals will guide your decision.

