ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker, Vanilla, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White leads on style and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior technology and support for serious runners, while the Saucony Women's Ride 18 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Price
ASICS is more expensive but offers advanced features.
Cushioning
Gel-Kayano 32 has superior cushioning technology.
Sales Rank
Gel-Kayano 32 ranks higher in bestseller lists.
Why Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker, Vanilla, 9 is better
Price
Saucony is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Ride 18 is lighter and more nimble.
Design
Ride 18 has a modern minimalist design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker, Vanilla, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | Gel-Kayano 32 | Ride 18 |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST™ PLUS | PWRRUN+ |
| Offset | N/A | 8mm |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are priced at $154.45, while the Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker is significantly cheaper at $89.00. This makes the Saucony sneaker about 42% less expensive than the ASICS model. If budget considerations are paramount, the Ride 18 offers a much more economical option without sacrificing too much in terms of quality and performance.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 features a lightweight engineered mesh upper that is not only breathable but also reduces the need for additional overlays, resulting in a streamlined look. It is part of the SUNNY SIZZLE collection, inspired by the golden hour and showcasing a gradient spray on the upper. On the other hand, the Saucony Women’s Ride 18 sports a clean and modern engineered mesh design that ensures a secure fit. While both models focus on comfort and style, the ASICS offers a more vibrant aesthetic, while the Saucony leans toward a minimalist approach.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels in cushioning with its FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole and a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, providing adaptive stability during runs. This shoe promises a smoother and more comfortable experience, especially for distance training. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Ride 18 features PWRRUN+ foam, designed to deliver an exceptional blend of cushioning and durability, making it the most comfortable version in its line yet. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Gel-Kayano 32 may offer more advanced support for serious runners, whereas the Ride 18 is targeted at casual runners looking for a responsive ride.
Performance Features
The performance features of the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 include Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, enhancing shock absorption. Additionally, its 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION helps accommodate different gait patterns, making it versatile for various runners. On the flip side, the Saucony Women's Ride 18 is built with neutral cushioning and an 8mm offset, providing a traditional yet nimble transition from heel to toe. While both shoes are designed for effective performance, the ASICS model offers more specialized technology aimed at optimizing stability and responsiveness.
Fit and Sizing
ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 aims to provide a comfortable fit, featuring a knit heel pull tab that makes it easier to put on and take off. This thoughtful design detail enhances the overall user experience. The Saucony Women's Ride 18 also focuses on fit, offering a modern engineered mesh that adapts to the foot's shape. However, it lacks the specific design features aimed at ease of wear present in the ASICS. Both shoes strive for a secure fit, but the Gel-Kayano 32 may be better for those looking for added convenience.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
ASICS holds a strong position in the running shoe market, with the Gel-Kayano 32 ranking 3,805 on bestseller lists, indicating its popularity among consumers. Saucony, while also reputable, has the Ride 18 ranked at 7,007. This suggests that the ASICS model is more established and favored among buyers, which can be a significant factor for consumers concerned with brand trust and product reliability.
User Experience and Reviews
The user experience with the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is enhanced by its advanced technology, which promises a supportive and balanced stride, particularly appreciated during long runs. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women's Ride 18 is noted for its comfortable and responsive ride, making it suitable for everyday use. While the Gel-Kayano 32 may appeal to serious runners looking for high-performance features, the Ride 18 is more aligned with casual runners who prioritize comfort without needing specialized technology.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Saucony Women's Ride 18 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a serious runner seeking advanced features and are willing to invest in your footwear at a price of $154.45, the Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior technology and support. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option that still provides comfort and quality at $89.00, the Ride 18 is a compelling alternative. Thus, your decision should reflect your running style, priorities, and financial considerations.

