ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White leads on support and fit.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior stability and support, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 excels in plush cushioning and comfort.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Stability
Features advanced stability technologies like 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM.
Support
Higher midsole stack height for better support during runs.
Durability
Built with robust materials for distance training.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Cushioning
Premium PWRRUN+ foam for maximum cushioning.
Price
More affordable at $119.95.
Weight
Lighter design for everyday wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | Gel-Kayano 32 | Triumph 22 |
| Price | $154.45 | $119.95 |
| Sales Rank | 3805 | 34383 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST™ PLUS | PWRRUN+ |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and Saucony Women's Triumph 22
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is priced at $154.45, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is about 17% cheaper at $119.95. Both shoes cater to runners looking for comfort and support but approach these needs with different technologies and features. The Gel-Kayano 32 boasts advanced stability features, while the Triumph 22 focuses on plush cushioning for a comfortable experience during long runs.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers a sleek and modern aesthetic with its black and white colorway, designed to keep your feet cool and comfortable. Its lightweight sublimated upper mesh is inspired by the colors of a sunrise or sunset, making it visually appealing for style-conscious runners. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 presents a more casual look with its Vapor/Moon color scheme, aimed at those who prefer a stylish sneaker for both workouts and everyday wear. While both shoes are attractive, the Gel-Kayano 32 stands out with its unique gradient spray that reflects the golden hour inspiration.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 excels with its premium PWRRUN+ foam, providing maximum cushioning and excellent energy return. This makes it particularly suitable for long-distance running and everyday wear. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 features FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole, which aims to deliver a balanced experience with a higher midsole stack height. While both shoes offer exceptional comfort, the Triumph 22 is specifically designed for plush cushioning, making it an excellent choice for those prioritizing comfort over a more structured feel.
Performance Features
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 includes several performance-enhancing features like the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which provide stability and a softer feel underfoot. This makes it ideal for runners who need extra support during their runs. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 offers a wide, stable platform and updated midsole geometry for smooth transitions, making it a great option for neutral runners who enjoy a more natural stride. While both shoes feature advanced technologies, the Gel-Kayano 32 leans more towards stability, while the Triumph 22 focuses on a smooth ride.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is crucial for runners, and both shoes incorporate engineered mesh uppers to enhance airflow. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32's lightweight mesh reduces the need for additional overlays, promoting a more comfortable fit. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22 also features a breathable mesh upper that adapts to the foot for a secure fit, minimizing hot spots and irritation. Ultimately, both models effectively address breathability, but the Gel-Kayano 32’s design may offer a slight edge in reducing overlays for a more seamless experience.
Durability and Traction
Durability and traction are essential for any running shoe. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is built with robust materials designed to withstand the rigors of distance training, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 includes a high-abrasion rubber outsole that ensures long-lasting durability and reliable grip on various surfaces. Given its bestseller rank of 38,005, the Triumph 22 has earned a reputation for being a dependable option for everyday use, but the Gel-Kayano 32 may have an advantage with its engineered materials specifically designed for stability and support.
Price Point Comparison
At $154.45, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is positioned higher in the market compared to the Saucony Women's Triumph 22, which retails for $119.95. This price difference of about $34.50 reflects the additional stability features and advanced cushioning technologies found in the Gel-Kayano 32. For budget-conscious buyers or those who prioritize value, the Triumph 22 presents a compelling option without compromising significantly on performance and comfort.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 ultimately depends on your specific running needs. If you require maximum stability and support for distance training, the Gel-Kayano 32 is an excellent choice, albeit at a higher price point. Alternatively, if you prioritize plush comfort and a smoother transition during runs, the Triumph 22 offers remarkable cushioning at a more accessible price. Ultimately, both shoes deliver quality and comfort, catering to different preferences among runners.

