vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White leads on support and comfort.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior support and performance for serious runners, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better

Performance

Advanced technologies for serious runners

Comfort

FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole for a smoother run

Durability

Engineered mesh upper enhances longevity

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, is better

Price

Significantly cheaper at $51.95

Weight

Lightweight design at 10.05 oz.

Versatility

Good for casual and varied surface runs

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
70

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteUnder Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
BrandASICSUnder Armour
ModelGel-Kayano 32Charged Surge 4
UpperEngineered meshBreathable mesh
MidsoleFF BLAST™ PLUSCharged Cushioning
Bestseller Rank38052697

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteUnder Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,

Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are a premium option for serious runners, priced at $154.45. These shoes feature advanced technologies designed for comfort and support. The 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM provides adaptive stability, which is particularly beneficial during long runs, while the Rearfoot PureGEL technology ensures a softer landing, reportedly 65% softer than standard GEL technology. With a bestseller rank of 3805, these shoes are a popular choice among runners who prioritize high performance and durability.

Overview of the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4

The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is a more budget-friendly alternative, retailing at $51.95, making it about 67% cheaper than the ASICS option. This shoe focuses on providing a balance of flexibility and cushioning, thanks to its Charged Cushioning midsole. Enhanced cushioning around the ankle collar contributes to overall comfort. With a bestseller rank of 2697, it indicates a solid demand among those looking for a reliable, everyday running shoe without breaking the bank.

Comfort and Fit

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels with its FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole, which aims to deliver a smooth running experience. The shoe also features a knit heel pull tab for easy on-and-off access. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 offers a Deluxe Comfort System sockliner that molds to the foot for ultimate comfort. While both shoes promise a comfortable fit, the Gel-Kayano 32 leans towards specialized support for serious runners, whereas the Charged Surge 4 focuses on general comfort for casual use.

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 presents a visually appealing design inspired by the colors of sunrise and sunset, featuring a lightweight sublimated upper mesh that keeps feet cool. Its aesthetic is complemented by a unique gradient spray on the upper and midsole. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 showcases a clean and simple design with a breathable mesh upper and synthetic overlays. While both shoes have attractive designs, the Gel-Kayano 32 stands out with its vibrant color inspiration, making it a more eye-catching option.

Performance on Different Surfaces

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is engineered for performance, particularly on longer runs. The 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION feature allows for improved compression at footstrike, catering to individual gait differences, which benefits runners looking for tailored support. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is designed to provide traction and durability with its durable rubber outsole. While both shoes perform well, the Gel-Kayano 32 is more suited for serious long-distance runners, while the Charged Surge 4 is ideal for those who run on varied surfaces and need a versatile shoe.

Durability and Longevity

Durability is a significant factor when investing in running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates features that enhance its longevity, such as the engineered mesh upper that minimizes wear and tear. The shoe's advanced technologies ensure it can withstand heavy use over time. In comparison, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is built with a focus on flexibility, but it might not offer the same level of durability as the Gel-Kayano 32. While both shoes are designed for daily use, the ASICS option is likely to endure longer under rigorous conditions.

Pricing and Value

With the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 priced at $154.45 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 at $51.95, there is a significant price difference of about $102.50. While the Gel-Kayano 32 justifies its higher price with advanced running technologies and features aimed at serious athletes, the Charged Surge 4 offers excellent value for casual runners looking for comfort at a lower price point. Buyers should consider their running habits and needs when evaluating which shoe provides better value.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 depends on your running style and budget. If you are a serious runner seeking advanced support and comfort for long distances, the Gel-Kayano 32 is the superior choice despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that offers decent comfort for casual runs, the Charged Surge 4 is an excellent alternative at about 67% less than the ASICS option. Your decision should align with your specific needs and how you plan to use the shoes.