ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on comfort and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and technology, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is a budget-friendly option. Choose based on your running needs.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Advanced FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technology
Moisture Management
OrthoLite X-55 sockliner for better comfort
Durability
Durable polyester lining and synthetic rubber outsole
Why Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $85.00
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates popularity
Simplicity
Straightforward design for casual use
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Nike |
| Current Price | $169.95 | $85.00 |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | Foam |
| Sockliner | OrthoLite X-55 | N/A |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | Standard |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes and Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 running shoes are priced at $169.95, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 running shoes are available for about $85.00, making the Nike model roughly 50% cheaper. Both shoes cater to runners but vary significantly in features and price points, appealing to different segments of the market. The ASICS model focuses on advanced cushioning and comfort, while the Nike model emphasizes a balance of comfort and support.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in comfort with its FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and PureGEL technology, designed to provide a soft landing experience. It is reported to be approximately 25g lighter than its predecessor, which enhances the overall running experience. In contrast, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 also delivers comfort through foam cushioning, but it does not offer the same level of advanced technology as the ASICS. The Nike's foam cushioning provides a plush sensation, but without the specialized GEL technology, it may not match the ASICS in terms of long-distance comfort.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features an engineered knit upper for breathability and reduces the need for additional overlays, giving it a sleek appearance. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3, on the other hand, presents a more straightforward look with its white, black, and pearl pink color scheme. While both shoes have their aesthetic appeal, the ASICS offers more modern materials that contribute to its overall lightness and comfort, making it a more attractive option for style-conscious runners.
Support and Stability
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 incorporates an OrthoLite X-55 sockliner, which not only enhances cushioning performance but also manages moisture, keeping your feet cooler and drier. This is particularly beneficial for longer runs. Meanwhile, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 features Flywire cables that secure the feet and provide stability when the laces are tightened. While both shoes offer support, the ASICS model's moisture management and sockliner may provide runners with better overall foot comfort during extended wear.
Durability and Build Quality
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is designed with a durable polyester lining and synthetic rubber outsole, which are crucial for longevity, especially for those who run frequently. The material choices suggest that the ASICS model is built to withstand the wear and tear of regular use. In comparison, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 also boasts a sturdy construction but lacks specific details about the materials used in its upper and outsole. Thus, while both shoes are designed for durability, the ASICS may have a slight edge in build quality due to its specified materials.
Performance for Runners
With a sales rank of 11,265, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is regarded as a solid choice among runners seeking comfort and advanced features. The shoe's combination of cushioning technologies is particularly advantageous for long-distance runners. Conversely, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3, with a much higher sales rank of 1,650, indicates a strong market preference, likely due to its lower price point and decent performance for casual runners. While the ASICS may be better suited for serious runners, the Nike offers a more budget-friendly option without compromising on essential performance features.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 retails for $169.95, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is priced at $85.00. This significant price difference of about $84 is indicative of the advanced technology and materials used in the ASICS model. For budget-conscious consumers or casual runners, the Nike model presents a much more accessible option, while those looking for specialized running technology may find the ASICS worth the investment.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 ultimately depends on your running needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, moisture management, and are willing to invest more, the ASICS offers superior comfort and technology. However, if you seek a more affordable option that still provides essential support and comfort for casual running, the Nike is an excellent choice. Each shoe caters to different runner profiles, making it essential to consider your specific requirements before making a purchase.

