vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide leads on price and comfort.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers great value and comfort at a lower price, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 provides advanced cushioning and a wider fit.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Price

ASICS is $90 cheaper than Brooks

Weight

ASICS is lighter than Brooks

Sales Rank

ASICS has a higher sales rank

Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better

Cushioning

Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning

Fit

Brooks offers a wide option for better fit

Durability

Brooks has a more robust construction

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
75
Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
BrandASICSBrooks
Price$69.95$159.95
Sales Rank124672293
Cushioning TechAMPLIFOAM PLUSDNA LOFT V3
Fit OptionsStandardWide

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3. The ASICS shoes are priced at $69.95, while the Brooks model comes in at $159.95. This means that the ASICS shoes are about 56% cheaper than their Brooks counterpart. For budget-conscious shoppers, the ASICS option presents a compelling case for value without sacrificing quality.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both shoes offer unique and appealing aesthetics. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a stylish Gravel/Lilac color combination, making it a versatile choice for casual wear and exercise alike. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is dressed in a sleek Black/Black/Rose Gold palette, which gives it a sporty yet sophisticated edge. While both designs are attractive, the choice between them may come down to personal style preferences.

Comfort and Cushioning

Comfort is paramount in running shoes, and both models excel in this aspect. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes Rearfoot GEL technology for superior shock absorption, complemented by AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for a soft ride. In comparison, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning, which aims to provide a plush feel. While the ASICS focuses on shock absorption, the Brooks emphasizes a high stack height for added comfort. Both options promise a comfortable running experience, but the specifics of each technology cater to different preferences.

Fit and Sizing

Sizing and fit are essential considerations for any footwear. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is available in standard sizes, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 comes in a Wide option, accommodating those who require a more inclusive fit. The Brooks model also features a unique construction designed to add more volume, making it suitable for orthotic users. If you prioritize fit and need extra room, the Brooks may be the better choice, while the ASICS provides a more traditional fit.

Performance

Performance in running shoes is crucial, and both models are designed to enhance your running experience. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with a molded rubber outsole that provides durability and traction, making it suitable for various running surfaces. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 also boasts a rubber outsole, which is complemented by its high stack design that enhances stability. Both shoes rank well in terms of sales, with the ASICS at a bestseller rank of 12,467 and the Brooks at a commendable 2,293, suggesting that the latter is a popular choice among runners seeking performance.

Technology Features

The technological features of both shoes highlight their distinct advantages. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 incorporates Rearfoot GEL technology for cushioning and shock absorption, while the AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning offers a soft ride. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 utilizes nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 that promises to enhance comfort and performance. Both shoes leverage advanced technology to improve the running experience, but the specific technologies may cater to different runner needs and preferences.

Durability

Durability is a vital factor when investing in running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole that offers a good balance of durability and traction, suitable for both daily wear and exercise. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 also employs a rubber outsole designed for long-lasting performance. While both shoes are built to withstand the rigors of running, the choice may depend on how frequently you plan to use them and the types of surfaces you intend to run on.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If budget is a key factor, the ASICS model is a clear winner at $69.95, providing excellent value while still delivering comfort and performance. However, if you require a wider fit and prefer advanced cushioning technology, the Brooks model at $159.95 may be worth the investment. Both shoes cater to different needs, making it essential to consider what aspects are most important for your running experience.