vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running leads on support and comfort.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers a more affordable option with decent comfort, while the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 excels in support and fit. Choose based on your specific running needs.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Price

ASICS is $70 cheaper than Brooks

Weight

ASICS is generally lighter

Sales Rank

ASICS has a better sales rank

Why Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running is better

Support

Brooks features GuideRails technology

Fit

Brooks has a roomy toe box

Breathability

Brooks uses engineered Air Mesh

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
75
Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running
CushioningRearfoot GEL, AMPLIFOAMBioMoGo DNA
Sales Rank1246721661
Upper MaterialMesh3D Fit Print, Air Mesh
Toe BoxStandardRoomy
Diabetic CertifiedNoYes

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15, priced at $69.95 compared to $139.95. This makes the ASICS option about 50% cheaper than the Brooks model. For budget-conscious shoppers, the ASICS shoes offer a compelling entry point without compromising on essential features. The price difference of $70 can be a decisive factor for those looking to invest in running shoes without breaking the bank.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, both shoes offer unique cushioning technologies designed to enhance the running experience. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features Rearfoot GEL technology and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which provide shock absorption and a soft ride. This design aims to enhance comfort over long distances. In contrast, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 employs BioMoGo DNA cushioning, which adapts to the runner's stride, weight, and speed, reducing impact on joints. Both options prioritize comfort, but the Brooks shoe may cater more to those needing advanced support for their joints.

Support Features

Support is a standout feature of the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15, which incorporates innovative GuideRails support technology to reduce excess joint movement, especially beneficial for runners prone to knee injuries. This shoe is also recognized as a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, emphasizing its focus on health and injury prevention. While the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers decent support with its cushioning technologies, it does not provide the specialized support that the Brooks model does, making the latter a better choice for athletes needing extra stability.

Fit and Sizing

The fit of a running shoe plays a crucial role in performance, and here the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 shines with its roomy toe box designed to accommodate orthotics or provide a better fit for those with voluminous feet. This generous fit can be particularly important for runners who require additional space for comfort. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 does not emphasize a specialized fit, focusing instead on a comfortable upper with no-sew details. For runners with specific fit needs, the Brooks model may offer a more tailored option.

Breathability

Breathability is another essential factor for running shoes, especially during longer runs. The Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 utilizes a 3D Fit Print and engineered Air Mesh upper, which provides a blend of stretch and structure, ensuring adequate airflow to keep feet cool. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 also features a mesh upper, but it does not highlight breathability as a primary trait. For runners concerned about overheating, the Brooks option may have the edge due to its superior breathability features.

Weight

Weight can significantly impact a runner's performance, and this is where the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 may have an advantage. While exact weights are not provided, ASICS shoes are generally designed to be lightweight, which can enhance speed and agility during runs. The Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15, while supportive, may be slightly heavier due to its added support features. Runners looking for a lighter shoe to improve their speed may find the ASICS model more appealing.

Sales Rank

In terms of popularity, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 has a sales rank of 12,467, while the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 has a sales rank of 21,661. This indicates that the ASICS model is currently more favored among consumers, which could suggest greater satisfaction or effectiveness. However, it’s important to consider that sales rank can fluctuate based on various factors, including seasonal demand and marketing efforts.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option that offers basic comfort and cushioning, the ASICS is a solid choice at $69.95. However, if you require advanced support, breathability, and a roomy fit, the Brooks, priced at $139.95, justifies its higher cost with specialized features. Evaluate your running style, comfort needs, and budget to make the best decision for your footwear.