ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe, which retails for $114.95. If you're budget-conscious and looking for a solid option for running, the Gel-Pulse 17 offers a more accessible entry point. While both shoes provide high-quality designs tailored for runners, the significant price difference could influence your decision, especially if you're looking for a good balance between cost and performance.

Comfort Features

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels with its super-soft nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning. This design optimizes comfort while remaining lightweight and durable, making it ideal for various activities like road running or gym workouts. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which enhances impact absorption and offers a comfortable ride. However, the Glycerin 21 is specifically marketed for those seeking "supreme comfort," which may appeal to runners prioritizing a plush experience over other factors.

Support and Stability

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 provides neutral support, ensuring maximum cushioning for a smooth running experience. It promotes stable transitions, which can be crucial for runners looking to maintain their pace over longer distances. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 also offers good cushioning with its rearfoot GEL technology, designed to absorb shock. While both shoes provide stability, the Glycerin 21's broader platform may better suit those needing extra support during runs, particularly for long-distance scenarios.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper for breathability and a molded rubber outsole for traction. Its Gravel/Lilac colorway is visually appealing for those seeking a stylish running shoe. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 presents a more muted Black/Grey/White palette, making it versatile for various outfits. Both designs reflect their brands' aesthetics, but personal preference will ultimately determine which shoe aligns better with your style.

Breathability

Breathability is a vital factor when choosing running shoes, especially for longer runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17's mesh upper is specifically designed to enhance airflow, keeping your feet cooler and more comfortable during exercise. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin 21 also features a breathable upper, described as an internal stretch bootie that allows for a flexible fit. While both shoes promote breathability, the ASICS may have a slight edge due to its dedicated mesh construction.

Foot Fit and Comfort

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with no-sew details for a comfortable fit, which can be beneficial for runners seeking to minimize chafing or discomfort during long runs. Alternatively, the Brooks Glycerin 21's plush internal fit and stretch bootie construction offer a unique wrapping sensation around the foot, ensuring it moves with you during your stride. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Brooks' design may cater better to those who prefer a more enveloping feel.

Weight and Performance

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is built with performance in mind, featuring technologies aimed at enhancing your running experience. The AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning and rearfoot GEL technology work together to provide a responsive and comfortable ride. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, while heavier due to its additional cushioning technology, aims to deliver unparalleled comfort during runs. If you prioritize lightweight performance, the Gel-Pulse 17 may suit you better, but if comfort is your main focus, the Glycerin 21 might be worth the extra weight.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 ultimately hinges on your specific running needs and budget. The ASICS model is a more budget-friendly option at $69.95, offering solid cushioning and a comfortable fit. However, if supreme comfort and maximum cushioning are your priorities, the Brooks Glycerin 21, despite its higher price of $114.95, might be the better choice. Each shoe excels in different areas, so consider what features matter most to you before making your decision.