ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women’s Revel 8 Neutral Running & Walking
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on price and durability, Brooks Women’s Revel 8 Neutral Running & Walking wins on sales rank and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers a more budget-friendly option, while the Brooks Women's Revel 8 excels in comfort and sales performance.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is $30 cheaper than Brooks
Durability
Molded rubber outsole for reliable wear
Target Audience
Better for casual runners
Why Brooks Women’s Revel 8 Neutral Running & Walking is better
Comfort
Adaptable DNA Loft v2 cushioning
Sales Performance
Higher sales rank at 1,089
Design
Sleek and versatile for casual outings
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Brooks Women’s Revel 8 Neutral Running & Walking |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Current Price | $69.95 | $99.95 |
| Cushioning | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | DNA Loft v2 |
| Outsole Type | Molded rubber | RoadTack rubber |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 1089 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, making it about 30% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Revel 8, which retails at $99.95. When considering budget constraints, the ASICS option offers a significant saving for those who are looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. This price difference of $30 could be a deciding factor for many buyers, especially if they are seeking a reliable shoe for casual use or fitness activities.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes Rearfoot GEL technology for shock absorption, paired with AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which enhances the overall comfort during runs. This design aims to provide a soft and comfortable ride, catering to those who prioritize cushioning in their footwear. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Revel 8 features adaptable DNA Loft v2 cushioning that adjusts to your stride and weight, offering a personalized comfort experience. While both shoes focus on cushioning, the Brooks may be more suitable for users who desire a customized feel during diverse activities.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 sports a mesh upper designed to enhance breathability and comfort, featuring a stylish Gravel/Lilac color scheme. This design aims to meet the aesthetic needs of fashion-conscious runners. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Revel 8 also emphasizes style with its sleek, modern look in White and Chateau Grey. It is crafted to transition well from workouts to casual outings, making it versatile in its design. For those who value both performance and style, the Brooks may edge out in terms of visual appeal and adaptability.
Durability and Outsole Performance
The ASICS model is equipped with a molded rubber outsole designed for durability and traction, ensuring reliability on various surfaces. The shoe's construction aims to withstand daily wear, making it a great option for regular runners. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Revel 8 features a RoadTack rubber outsole, which is not only lightweight but also engineered for optimal rebound and superior traction. This focus on performance means that the Brooks may be better suited for those who frequently tackle a range of terrains and wish to maintain a confident stride.
Target Audience
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is geared towards casual runners and individuals seeking comfort for daily wear. Its features are tailored to provide a comfortable experience for those who may not be serious athletes but still require reliable footwear. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Revel 8 actively targets runners and walkers aiming to enhance their fitness, offering a smooth ride that supports various activities. The Brooks shoe, having earned the APMA Seal of Acceptance, may appeal more to fitness enthusiasts or those engaged in regular training.
Sales Performance
In terms of sales rank, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is currently ranked at 12,467, indicating a moderate level of popularity among buyers. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Revel 8 boasts a significantly higher sales rank of 1,089, suggesting that it is a preferred choice among consumers. This difference in sales performance may reflect the Brooks' stronger appeal or reputation within the running community, potentially influencing a buyer’s decision based on popularity and user feedback.
User Experience and Breathability
Breathability is a critical aspect of running shoes, and both models offer features designed to keep your feet cool. The ASICS shoe incorporates a mesh upper for ventilation, while the Brooks Women’s Revel 8 uses an updated engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability and structure. This design not only contributes to comfort but also ensures that users can engage in extended workouts without overheating. Both shoes have their merits in this area, but the Brooks may provide a slight advantage due to its enhanced design elements that focus on maintaining airflow.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Brooks Women’s Revel 8 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If budget is a primary concern, the ASICS model offers a more economical option without sacrificing essential features. However, if you prioritize customizable comfort and superior sales performance, the Brooks shoe may be worth the extra investment. Consider your running habits, style preferences, and the importance of features like breathability and cushioning to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

