ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs FitVille Wide Toe Box Shoes Women Comfortable Non
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on cushioning and durability, FitVille Wide Toe Box Shoes Women Comfortable Non wins on fit.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 excels in performance and durability, while the FitVille offers comfort and a lower price. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Performance
ASICS is designed specifically for running.
Durability
Molded rubber outsole for long-lasting use.
Cushioning
Advanced AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning technology.
Why FitVille Wide Toe Box Shoes Women Comfortable Non is better
Price
FitVille is $10 cheaper.
Comfort
Wide toe box for natural toe spread.
Versatility
Suitable for walking and casual use.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | FitVille Wide Toe Box Shoes Women Comfortable Non |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | FitVille |
| Model | Gel-Pulse 17 | Wide Toe Box |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 26121 |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Thin Mesh |
| Outsole | Molded Rubber | Anti-Slip Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, while the FitVille Wide Toe Box Shoes are available for $59.89. This makes the FitVille option about 14% cheaper than the ASICS shoes, providing a more budget-friendly alternative without sacrificing essential features. For shoppers on a tighter budget, the FitVille model offers a compelling choice, especially considering its focus on comfort and support.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 boasts a stylish Gravel/Lilac color scheme that appeals to many runners. The mesh upper adds a modern touch while promoting breathability. In contrast, the FitVille shoes come in an all-black design, catering to those who prefer a classic look. While both shoes have their unique appeal, the ASICS model’s vibrant colors may attract more attention, whereas the FitVille's simplicity can be seen as versatile for various occasions.
Comfort and Fit
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with Rearfoot GEL technology and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, providing a soft and comfortable ride. Its features aim to enhance shock absorption during runs. On the other hand, the FitVille shoes prioritize a wide toe box, allowing for natural toe spread and relaxation. With cushioned insoles and a breathable upper, they are particularly suitable for those with swollen feet or wider feet. For comfort, the ASICS model offers advanced cushioning technologies, while the FitVille excels in providing a spacious fit.
Performance and Support
In terms of performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is equipped with a molded rubber outsole, designed to provide good traction and durability for running. Its sales rank of 12,467 indicates a favorable reception among users, likely due to its performance attributes. Conversely, the FitVille shoes feature an anti-slip rubber outsole, ensuring good grip for both indoor and outdoor activities. While the ASICS model is tailored for runners, the FitVille shoes are versatile enough for walking and light workouts, making them a great option for everyday use.
Breathability and Temperature Control
Breathability is crucial for athletic shoes, and both models showcase their strengths here. The ASICS model features a mesh upper that enhances airflow, keeping feet cool during runs. The FitVille shoes also offer a breathable design, thanks to their thin mesh body, which allows for proper ventilation. This focus on breathability in both models makes them suitable for warmer climates, though the ASICS model may have a slight edge due to its advanced materials designed specifically for athletic performance.
Durability and Construction
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is built with durability in mind, featuring a molded rubber outsole intended to withstand rigorous activity. Its construction reflects a focus on long-lasting performance, which is supported by its positive sales rank. The FitVille shoes, while lightweight, emphasize comfort with their cushioned design, but their durability may not match that of the ASICS model. For serious runners seeking longevity in their footwear, the ASICS model may be the better choice.
Versatility and Use Cases
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is primarily designed for running, making it an excellent choice for those focused on fitness and athletic performance. The molded rubber outsole and advanced cushioning make it suitable for longer distances and varied terrains. In contrast, the FitVille Wide Toe Box Shoes are more versatile, designed for walking, light exercise, and even casual outings. This flexibility makes them ideal for individuals who need a comfortable shoe for various activities without the specific focus on running.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the FitVille Wide Toe Box Shoes hinges on your specific needs. If you prioritize running performance, advanced cushioning, and durability, the ASICS model is the clear winner at $69.95. However, if comfort, a wide fit, and a lower price point of $59.89 are more important to you, the FitVille shoes are an excellent option. Each shoe caters to different preferences, making it essential to consider how you intend to use them before making your decision.