ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium
Updated August 2026 — Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium leads on sales rank and durability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers great value for budget-conscious runners, while the Hoka Women's Bondi 9 excels in comfort and advanced features for serious runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is significantly cheaper at $69.95.
Breathability
Mesh upper provides good airflow.
Sales Rank
Lower sales rank indicates moderate interest.
Why Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium is better
Cushioning
Premium foam midsole offers superior comfort.
Durability
Durabrasion rubber enhances outsole longevity.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates strong consumer preference.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | HOKA |
| Price | $69.95 | $165.22 |
| Cushioning | AMPLIFOAM | Premium Foam |
| Outsole | Molded Rubber | Durabrasion Rubber |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 3046 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are significantly cheaper than the Hoka Women's Bondi 9, priced at $69.95 compared to $165.22. This makes the ASICS about 58% cheaper than the Hoka. The price difference reflects the target market for each shoe, with ASICS aiming for budget-conscious runners and Hoka positioning itself as a premium brand. The Gel-Pulse 17 provides essential features for daily wear, while the Bondi 9 boasts advanced cushioning technologies that justify its higher price tag.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper, which promotes breathability and comfort. Its Gravel/Lilac color scheme offers a subtle yet stylish appearance suitable for casual outings. On the other hand, the Hoka Women's Bondi 9 comes in a striking Black/White combination that emphasizes its modern aesthetic. The structured knit upper and 3D molded collar of the Bondi 9 not only enhance the shoe's visual appeal but also contribute to its overall comfort and fit, appealing to those who prioritize both style and functionality.
Cushioning Technology
The cushioning in the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is mainly provided by Rearfoot GEL technology and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning. These features focus on shock absorption and a comfortable ride, making it suitable for daily wear. In contrast, the Hoka Women's Bondi 9 is engineered with a premium foam midsole and increased stack height, delivering unparalleled plushness. This shoe is designed for those who prefer a soft and resilient ride, ideal for longer distances or everyday running. The advanced cushioning of the Bondi 9 sets it apart for runners seeking maximum comfort.
Breathability
Breathability is an important factor for running shoes, and both models excel in this area but employ different methods. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes a mesh upper to facilitate airflow, ensuring that the feet remain cool during runs. Meanwhile, the Hoka Women's Bondi 9 has a structured knit upper with zonal breathability, allowing for strategic ventilation. This feature is particularly beneficial during long runs, as it helps to manage moisture and temperature. While both shoes prioritize breathability, the Bondi 9's design offers a slightly enhanced approach for serious runners.
Outsole Durability
Durability in the outsole is crucial for long-term performance, and both shoes take different approaches. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole, designed to provide traction and withstand wear during daily use. The Hoka Women's Bondi 9, however, incorporates Durabrasion rubber in its outsole, specifically engineered to combat high wear zones. This makes the Bondi 9 more suitable for runners who log significant mileage, as it is built to endure the rigors of extensive training.
Sales Performance
Sales rank can often provide insight into a product's popularity and consumer preference. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 has a sales rank of 12,467, indicating a moderate level of market interest. In contrast, the Hoka Women's Bondi 9 enjoys a much higher sales rank of 3,046, suggesting it is a top choice among consumers. This difference in rankings may be attributed to Hoka's reputation for high-quality running shoes and the Bondi 9's strong following among serious runners.
Target Audience
The target audience for each shoe varies significantly. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is aimed at everyday runners or those looking for a comfortable shoe for casual wear, making it a great choice for budget-conscious consumers. The Hoka Women's Bondi 9, with its premium features and higher price, targets serious runners and fitness enthusiasts who prioritize advanced cushioning and performance. This distinction is crucial for consumers to consider when choosing between the two models, as it directly impacts their running experience.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Hoka Women's Bondi 9 hinges on your priorities as a runner. If you are looking for a budget-friendly shoe that offers essential features for daily wear, the ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 is a solid choice at $69.95. However, if you are willing to invest in a premium shoe designed for maximum comfort during long runs, the Hoka Bondi 9 at $165.22 is likely the better option. Each shoe has its merits, so consider your running habits, style preferences, and budget before making a choice.

