ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium
Updated August 2026 — Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium leads on comfort and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers great value for budget-conscious shoppers, while the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 excels in comfort and performance.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is $69.95, significantly cheaper than Hoka's $145.00.
Weight
ASICS is lighter, making it easier for casual wear.
Moisture Management
ASICS features an advanced sockliner for moisture control.
Why Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium is better
Comfort
Hoka provides superior cushioning for long runs.
Design
Hoka has a modern jacquard knit upper.
Sales Rank
Hoka has a higher bestseller rank at 2584.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | HOKA |
| Model | Gel-Pulse 17 | Clifton 10 |
| Price | $69.95 | $145.00 |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 2584 |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Jacquard Knit |
| Cushioning Tech | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | Ultralight |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, making them about 52% cheaper than the Hoka Women's Clifton 10, which retails for $145.00. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers looking for reliable running shoes. While the ASICS model offers a strong value for its price, it's essential to consider what features come with each option when evaluating their overall worth.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 provides an impressive underfoot experience characterized by its ultralight cushioning. This shoe features a 3mm increase in heel-to-toe drop, enhancing comfort for daily maintenance miles. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is equipped with Rearfoot GEL technology and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, designed to absorb shocks and deliver a soft ride. Both options prioritize comfort, but the Hoka model may be preferable for those who prioritize plush cushioning during longer runs.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 showcases a mesh upper, which is both breathable and functional. Its gravel and lilac colorway offers a stylish yet practical look. Conversely, the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 sports a clean, minimalist design with a jacquard knit upper, emphasizing a modern appeal. While design is subjective, the Clifton's double-lace lock system also adds an element of functionality, ensuring a secure fit. Customers looking for a contemporary style may lean towards Hoka, while those who appreciate a classic running shoe design might prefer ASICS.
Fit and Sizing
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is available in size 9, while the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 is offered in size 7.5. This difference in sizing options can affect the overall fit experience for consumers. Both brands are known for their comfortable fits, but the specific sizing may limit options for some shoppers. The Clifton’s adjustable double-lace lock system is a notable feature that enhances fit, while the ASICS model is praised for its snug feel thanks to its no-sew upper details.
Breathability and Moisture Management
Breathability is a key factor in running shoe performance, and both models offer features designed to manage moisture. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 includes an OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner, which promotes advanced moisture management and breathability. Meanwhile, the Hoka Women's Clifton 10’s jacquard knit upper also contributes to breathability, making it ideal for warm-weather runs. Both shoes effectively manage moisture, but ASICS’s dedicated sockliner may provide a slight edge for those particularly concerned about sweat and odor.
Performance and Versatility
In terms of performance, the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 has a significantly higher bestseller rank at 2584 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, which ranks at 12467. This suggests that the Clifton is favored by more consumers, likely due to its long-standing reputation as a reliable running shoe. The Clifton’s design as a daily trainer also emphasizes its versatility, while the Gel-Pulse 17 is better suited for casual wear and less intense running. Depending on the intensity of your running routine, one model may better meet your needs than the other.
Brand Reputation
Both ASICS and Hoka are well-regarded brands in the running community, known for their quality and performance. ASICS has a long history of producing running shoes that balance comfort and technology, whereas Hoka is celebrated for its innovative designs and cushioning systems. The Hoka Women's Clifton 10’s longstanding presence in the market as a trusted trainer speaks volumes about its reliability. However, ASICS’s commitment to comfort and shock absorption makes the Gel-Pulse 17 a worthy contender for those seeking everyday footwear.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly option with solid comfort features, the ASICS model offers great value at $69.95. However, if you prioritize plush cushioning and a modern design, the Hoka Clifton 10, despite its higher price of $145.00, may be the better investment due to its higher bestseller rank and reputation for performance. Consider your running habits, style preferences, and budget to determine which shoe aligns best with your lifestyle.

