ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs IQYNAM Running Shoes for Men Women Tennis Walking
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on durability and performance, IQYNAM Running Shoes for Men Women Tennis Walking wins on price and versatility.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers superior performance and comfort for serious runners, while the IQYNAM shoes are a budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Performance
ASICS shoes are designed for running with advanced cushioning technology.
Durability
ASICS shoes are built with quality materials for longevity.
Brand Reputation
ASICS is a well-established brand known for high-quality athletic footwear.
Why IQYNAM Running Shoes for Men Women Tennis Walking is better
Price
IQYNAM shoes are significantly cheaper at $18.99.
Versatility
IQYNAM shoes are suitable for various casual activities.
Design
IQYNAM shoes have a straightforward and utilitarian design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | IQYNAM Running Shoes for Men Women Tennis Walking |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | IQYNAM |
| Price | $69.95 | $18.99 |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 15067 |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
| Cushioning | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | None |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, while the IQYNAM Running Shoes for Men and Women are significantly cheaper at $18.99. This means the IQYNAM shoes are about 73% less expensive than the ASICS option. If budget is your primary concern, the IQYNAM shoes offer a very attractive price point that may appeal to casual users or those looking for a functional shoe without breaking the bank.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper that enhances breathability and comfort, along with a stylish gravel and lilac color combination. On the other hand, the IQYNAM Running Shoes present a more straightforward and utilitarian design, primarily in black, making them versatile for various activities. The ASICS shoes are likely to attract those who prefer a more fashionable and performance-oriented look, while the IQYNAM shoes cater to individuals seeking practicality and ease of wear in their daily activities.
Comfort Features
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 emphasizes comfort with its Rearfoot GEL technology, which provides excellent shock absorption, along with AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for a softer ride. This design is beneficial for those engaging in longer runs or walks. Conversely, the IQYNAM Running Shoes utilize a breathable mesh upper and a skin-friendly inner lining that prioritizes comfort during casual wear or short bursts of activity. While the IQYNAM shoes provide decent comfort for everyday use, they lack the specialized cushioning technology found in the ASICS shoes, making the latter a better choice for serious runners.
Performance and Functionality
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed for running with features such as a molded rubber outsole that enhances traction and durability. This makes them suitable for various terrains and running conditions. The IQYNAM Running Shoes also offer functionality with their non-slip EVA sole and breathable design, making them appropriate for a range of activities like walking, jogging, and casual sports. However, for dedicated runners, the ASICS shoes provide superior technology that enhances performance, making them the preferred choice for serious athletic endeavors.
Durability and Build Quality
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is built with a focus on longevity, featuring quality materials like a mesh upper and a rubber outsole that can withstand regular wear. Its design incorporates advanced cushioning that not only enhances comfort but also contributes to its durability over time. The IQYNAM Running Shoes, while functional, may not match the build quality of the ASICS, as they are designed more for casual use rather than intensive training. Users looking for shoes that can endure rigorous activity might find the ASICS shoes to be the more reliable option in this comparison.
Versatility and Use Cases
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is primarily geared towards runners, making it an excellent choice for various running activities and workouts. However, its appealing design also makes it suitable for casual wear. The IQYNAM Running Shoes, with their slip-on design and versatile aesthetic, can be used for numerous occasions, including work, walking, and casual outings. While both shoes have their strengths in versatility, the IQYNAM shoes may be more adaptable for those who require a multi-purpose shoe for different settings.
Brand Reputation and Popularity
ASICS is a well-established brand known for its high-quality athletic footwear, and the Gel-Pulse series has garnered a solid reputation among runners, evidenced by its sales rank of 12,467. The IQYNAM brand, while offering budget-friendly options, has not yet reached the same level of recognition and trust among consumers, as indicated by its sales rank of 15,067. This difference in brand reputation may influence buyers who prioritize quality and performance over price.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and IQYNAM Running Shoes ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a dedicated runner looking for advanced comfort and performance features, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is worth the investment at $69.95. However, if you are seeking an affordable, versatile shoe for casual wear and light activities, the IQYNAM Running Shoes at $18.99 provide significant savings while still offering decent comfort and functionality. Both shoes have their merits, so consider how you plan to use them when making your decision.

