ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on comfort and traction, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on sustainability and versatility.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers better shock absorption and traction, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 excels in sustainability and versatility.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is $0.04 cheaper
Cushioning
ASICS has superior shock absorption
Traction
ASICS offers better traction on diverse surfaces
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better
Sustainability
New Balance has 3% bio-based content
Versatility
New Balance is designed for various activities
Upper Comfort
New Balance features a precision-engineered knit upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Model | Gel-Pulse 17 | Fresh Foam 680 V8 |
| Upper | Mesh | Knit |
| Outsole | Rubber | Integrated Rubber |
| Drop | Not specified | 8 mm |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is slightly more expensive at $69.99. This makes the ASICS shoes about $0.04 cheaper than the New Balance option. Although the price difference is minimal, consumers looking for budget-friendly options may appreciate the lower price tag of the ASICS. Both products are positioned similarly in the market, with the ASICS ranking 12,467 and the New Balance at 13,745 in sales rank.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, both running shoes offer impressive features. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 boasts Rearfoot GEL technology, providing shock absorption and cushioning, while the AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning offers a softer ride. Contrastingly, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 utilizes a precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole, designed to deliver an ultra-cushioned and lightweight experience, with about 3% bio-based content to promote sustainability. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the ASICS may provide slightly better shock absorption, making it more suitable for high-impact activities.
Upper Construction
The upper construction of the ASICS features a mesh material that enhances breathability, contributing to the overall comfort. The design also incorporates no-sew details for a snug fit. On the other hand, the New Balance running shoe includes a precision-engineered knit upper, which offers targeted ventilation and maximum comfort. This knit construction allows for a sleek fit while ensuring breathability. Both uppers focus on providing comfort, but the New Balance may excel in targeted ventilation due to its knit design.
Outsole Durability
The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole, designed to provide durability and traction during runs. This outsole design is known for its ability to withstand varied terrains. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8, however, comes with an integrated rubber outsole that enhances underfoot comfort. While both outsoles are built for durability, the ASICS’ molded design may offer a slight edge in terms of traction on diverse surfaces, making it a better choice for outdoor running enthusiasts.
Sustainability
Sustainability is a growing concern among consumers, and the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 addresses this with approximately 3% bio-based content in its midsole foam. This eco-friendly approach helps reduce the carbon footprint associated with manufacturing. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 does not highlight any specific sustainable practices in its materials or construction. For environment-conscious buyers, the New Balance may be the preferable option, given its commitment to incorporating renewable resources.
Versatility
Both the ASICS and New Balance running shoes are designed for versatility, suitable for various activities ranging from daily runs to casual errands. However, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 explicitly states that it is built for everyday runs, workouts, and long runs, making it a more versatile choice for runners who engage in a variety of activities. The ASICS, while comfortable for daily wear, is more focused on providing good comfort during running specifically. Therefore, if versatility is a key factor, the New Balance may have a slight advantage.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a more subdued yet stylish look. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8, with its modern design and precision-engineered knit upper, offers a sleek and contemporary appearance that may attract buyers looking for a fashionable running shoe. While both shoes possess their unique styles, the choice may ultimately come down to personal preference in color and design.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize shock absorption and traction, the ASICS may be the better option, especially given its slightly lower price at $69.95. However, if sustainability and versatility are more important, the New Balance's innovative midsole and focus on everyday wear make it a compelling choice, albeit at a marginally higher price of $69.99. Both shoes are well-built and cater to different aspects of running and daily comfort, making either a solid choice for any runner.

