vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running leads on durability and price.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers better value for budget-conscious shoppers, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav excels in durability and style.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Price

ASICS is $10.04 cheaper

Comfort

Advanced cushioning technology

Fit

OrthoLite sockliner for moisture management

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better

Durability

NDurance outsole technology

Support

Ultra Heel design for targeted support

Popularity

Higher bestseller rank at 2101

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
75
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
Price$69.95$79.99
Sales Rank124672101
CushioningAMPLIFOAM PLUSFresh Foam
OutsoleMolded rubberNDurance

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are about 13% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe. The ASICS model is priced at $69.95, while the New Balance option retails for $79.99. This price difference of $10.04 may be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. Given that both options are designed for comfort and support, the ASICS may appeal more to those looking to save money without sacrificing performance.

Comfort Features

Comfort is a key factor for runners, and both the ASICS and New Balance shoes offer unique features aimed at enhancing the running experience. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 incorporates AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, designed to provide a softer ride than standard cushioning options. Its Rearfoot GEL technology further ensures effective shock absorption. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav features a fresh foam midsole that promises plush cushioning, along with a bootie construction that wraps around the foot for a sock-like feel. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the ASICS may edge out with its advanced cushioning technology.

Fit and Support

Fit and support are crucial when selecting running shoes, and both models take unique approaches to these aspects. The ASICS model boasts an OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner, which enhances moisture management and breathability, contributing to a comfortable fit. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe features an Ultra Heel design that provides targeted support, ensuring a secure fit during runs. For runners who require a more adaptive fit, the removable insole of the New Balance may cater better to individual foot shapes. Ultimately, both shoes offer solid support, but the choice will depend on personal preference.

Durability

Durability is paramount for runners who log many miles. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is equipped with a molded rubber outsole, designed to withstand the rigors of daily wear. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav employs NDurance outsole technology, which is specifically engineered to handle the wear and tear of road miles. Given that the New Balance has a higher bestseller rank at 2101 compared to ASICS at 12467, it may indicate a stronger reputation for durability in the market. Therefore, if long-term durability is a priority, the New Balance might be the better option.

Style and Aesthetics

Style can influence a buyer's decision, and both the ASICS and New Balance shoes have distinct aesthetic appeals. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac colorway, offering a blend of subtlety and vibrancy that may attract a broad range of consumers. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav features a Black/Light Aluminum color scheme, which provides a sleek and modern look. While both styles have their unique charm, the choice between them will ultimately depend on personal taste and the desired look for a running shoe.

Performance on the Run

When it comes to performance, both models have been engineered to enhance the running experience. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 focuses on comfort with its shock-attenuating features, making it suitable for everyday wear and long runs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav, however, emphasizes cushioning and support with its plush foam midsole and bootie construction. Runners seeking a plush, cushioned experience may prefer the New Balance, while those looking for a stable shoe with effective shock absorption might lean toward the ASICS. Each shoe excels in different performance areas, catering to varying runner preferences.

Customer Feedback and Popularity

Popularity can often reflect customer satisfaction, and the bestseller ranks of both shoes indicate their reception in the market. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 holds a rank of 12467, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav is significantly higher at 2101. This suggests that the New Balance may have garnered more attention and approval among consumers, potentially due to its innovative design features and comfort level. The higher sales rank might sway buyers towards the New Balance, especially those who prioritize peer recommendations and market trends.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe largely depends on your specific needs and preferences. If budget is your primary concern, the ASICS model is about 13% cheaper and offers excellent comfort features. However, if you're looking for superior durability and a more modern style, the New Balance may justify its higher price point. Both shoes excel in different aspects, so assess what features matter most to you—whether it's price, comfort, support, or durability—before making your decision.