ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Nike Women's Pegasus 41 White/White/Pure
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, leads on cushioning and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers better value and comfort, while the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 excels in responsiveness and breathability.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is $41.72 cheaper than Nike.
Comfort
ASICS features superior cushioning technology.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better bestseller rank.
Why Nike Women's Pegasus 41 White/White/Pure is better
Responsiveness
Nike offers a more energized ride.
Breathability
Nike has improved engineered mesh.
Weight
Nike is lighter due to its design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Nike Women's Pegasus 41 White/White/Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | ReactX foam |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Outsole | Molded Rubber | Durable Rubber |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Shock Absorption | Rearfoot GEL | Air Zoom |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, making it about 37% cheaper than the Nike Women's Pegasus 41, which retails for $111.67. When considering your budget for running shoes, this significant price difference could influence your decision. The Gel-Pulse 17 offers a more economical option for those looking for comfort and performance without breaking the bank.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a stylish Gravel/Lilac hue, while the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 comes in a clean White/White/Pure Platinum/Metallic Silver palette. Both designs cater to different preferences; the ASICS model is geared towards a more muted, elegant look, while the Nike model exudes a contemporary, sporty vibe. The choice ultimately depends on personal style and how the shoes will complement your running gear.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is key in running shoes, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with a mesh upper and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning that provides a soft and comfortable ride. This allows for better impact absorption, making it suitable for daily wear. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 features an upgraded breathable engineered mesh upper and dual Air Zoom units that promise a responsive and energized ride. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the Gel-Pulse 17 may offer a slightly softer experience due to its unique cushioning technology.
Technology and Performance
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 incorporates Rearfoot GEL technology for shock absorption, along with an OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner that enhances moisture management and breathability. This makes it an excellent choice for those who prioritize cushioning and comfort during runs. The Nike Women's Pegasus 41 utilizes ReactX foam and Air Zoom units that provide an energized feel, focusing on responsiveness and lightweight energy return. Depending on your running style—whether you prefer cushioned comfort or a more dynamic ride—each shoe offers distinct technological advantages.
Durability
Durability is essential for running shoes, especially for those who log many miles. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is built with a molded rubber outsole, which enhances its longevity and traction on various surfaces. In comparison, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 also boasts a durable construction but emphasizes improved breathability, which might be a factor if you run in warmer conditions. Both shoes are designed to withstand regular wear, but the ASICS may have a slight edge in terms of outsole durability.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 holds a bestseller rank of 12,467, indicating solid performance in the market, while the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 is ranked at 29,992. This suggests that the ASICS model is currently more favored among consumers, potentially due to its competitive pricing and comfort features. Brand reputation plays a significant role in purchasing decisions, and ASICS has a long-standing history of producing reliable running footwear.
User Experience and Feedback
User feedback often highlights the comfort levels associated with the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, particularly praising its cushioning and fit for daily wear. Meanwhile, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 is celebrated for its responsive cushioning and lightweight design, appealing to a different segment of runners who prioritize speed and energy return. Both shoes have their strengths; however, your choice should align with your running style and personal preferences.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 boils down to your priorities as a runner. If budget is a significant concern, the Gel-Pulse 17 offers a compelling package at $69.95, with excellent cushioning and comfort. However, if you're willing to invest in a shoe that emphasizes responsiveness and breathability, the Pegasus 41 at $111.67 may be worth the extra cost. Consider your running habits, foot comfort preferences, and aesthetic choices to make the best decision for your running needs.