vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Updated August 2026 — Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, leads on breathability and comfort.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers superior cushioning, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is more affordable and popular. Choose based on your priorities.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced shock absorption technology.

Durability

Molded rubber outsole for better grip.

Style

Unique Gravel/Lilac color scheme.

Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better

Price

Nike is $9.95 cheaper.

Popularity

Nike has a significantly better sales rank.

Breathability

Nike's updated mesh design enhances airflow.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
75
Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
BrandASICSNike
UpperMeshMesh
MidsoleGEL technologyFoam
OutsoleMolded rubberFlex grooves
WeightUnknownUnknown

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Introduction to ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and Nike Women's Revolution 8

When comparing the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8, it's clear that both offer unique features catering to different types of runners. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, while the Nike Revolution 8 is about 17% cheaper at $60.00. This price difference might influence your decision, but other factors such as comfort, breathability, and design also play a significant role.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, both shoes incorporate advanced cushioning technologies, but they take different approaches. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes Rearfoot GEL technology, which is specifically designed for shock absorption, making it a great choice for runners looking for extra cushioning on impact. On the other hand, the Nike Revolution 8 features a foam midsole that provides intuitive cushioning through a comfort-focused rocker geometry. Depending on your running style, you might prefer the more pronounced shock absorption of the ASICS or the responsive cushioning of the Nike.

Breathability and Fit

Breathability is another crucial factor for running shoes, and here both brands excel, but with different designs. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper that allows for good airflow, while the Nike Revolution 8 enhances breathability with a more breathable upper than its predecessor, the Revolution 7. The specific design of the Nike’s mesh helps keep your feet cool during runs. If you value a shoe that promotes airflow, both models will serve you well, but the Nike may have a slight edge in this area thanks to its updated design.

Outsole Performance

The outsole design significantly affects traction and durability. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 comes with a molded rubber outsole, providing a solid grip and durability on various surfaces. Conversely, the Nike Revolution 8 boasts a design with flex grooves in the forefoot, which enhances flexibility and comfort while running. The ASICS may be better suited for varied terrains, while the Nike's outsole design may appeal to those who favor a more natural running motion.

Weight and Agility

Weight can greatly influence a runner's agility and speed. Unfortunately, the product descriptions do not provide specifics on the weight of either shoe, but both brands are known for lightweight designs. However, the ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 is targeted more towards those seeking cushioning and support, which might add a bit of weight. The Nike Revolution 8, aimed at being a versatile running shoe, likely prioritizes a lighter build that enhances speed and agility.

Style and Aesthetics

When it comes to style, personal preference plays a significant role. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac color scheme, which may appeal to runners looking for a more subtle and elegant look. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 features a classic Black/White-Iron Grey design, offering a timeless and versatile option that can match various outfits. Both shoes provide stylish options, but your choice may depend on which color scheme resonates more with your personal style.

Price and Value

The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, while the Nike Revolution 8 is more budget-friendly at $60.00. This makes the Nike about 17% cheaper than the ASICS. While price is an important factor, it's essential to consider the overall value based on features and performance. If cushioning and advanced technology are essential to you, the ASICS might justify the higher price. However, if you are looking for a balance of comfort and affordability, the Nike could be the better option.

Popularity and Sales Rank

Popularity can indicate quality and performance in running shoes. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 holds a sales rank of 12,467, while the Nike Revolution 8 is significantly more popular with a sales rank of 1,608. This suggests that more consumers are choosing the Nike model, possibly due to its combination of comfort, breathability, and price. A higher sales rank often reflects customer satisfaction and could sway your decision if you value community feedback.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 ultimately depends on your personal priorities as a runner. If you prioritize advanced cushioning and are willing to pay a bit more, the ASICS may be the better choice for you. However, if you are looking for a more affordable option with excellent breathability and a timeless design, the Nike Revolution 8 stands out as a solid contender. Consider your running style, comfort needs, and budget as you make your final decision.