ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe comes in at $49.95. This makes the ASICS shoes approximately 40% more expensive than the Saucony option. The price difference may influence budget-conscious buyers, especially those looking to get quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While the ASICS model offers advanced cushioning features, the Saucony provides a solid alternative at a lower price point, making it a more appealing choice for many runners.

Brand Reputation

ASICS and Saucony are both respected names in the running shoe market, with each brand having its loyal following. ASICS is known for its emphasis on cushioning and support, which is evident in the Gel-Pulse 17's design. In contrast, Saucony has built a reputation for providing reliable performance and comfort, as seen with the Cohesion 14. The Saucony model has a bestseller rank of 10,869, while the ASICS model ranks at 12,467, indicating that the Cohesion 14 is currently favored by more customers. This popularity may suggest that many runners find the Saucony shoes to be a preferred choice.

Comfort Features

Both the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 prioritize comfort, but they achieve it through different technologies. The ASICS model boasts Rearfoot GEL technology, which is designed for shock absorption, along with AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning that enhances comfort during runs. On the other hand, the Saucony model features VERSARUN cushioning, which absorbs impact and reduces pressure for a smooth running experience. For runners who prioritize cushioning technology, both options have their merits, but the unique cushioning systems may sway preference based on personal comfort needs.

Outsole Design

Outsole design plays a crucial role in the performance of running shoes, and both the ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 and Saucony Cohesion 14 offer distinct approaches. The ASICS shoe has a molded rubber outsole, which is designed to provide durability and traction during runs. Meanwhile, the Saucony model features a redesigned outsole that takes inspiration from trusted styles, ensuring a smooth feel and longevity for various terrains. While both shoes are engineered for durability, the specific designs may attract different types of runners depending on their preferred running surfaces.

Fit and Breathability

Fit and breathability are essential for runners, and both models cater to these needs, albeit differently. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with a mesh upper that enhances airflow and provides a comfortable fit. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 also emphasizes a comfortable, secure fit with a lace-up closure and breathable materials. Each shoe has its approach to fit, and runners may prefer one over the other based on their foot shape and personal comfort preferences.

Weight Considerations

The weight of running shoes can significantly impact performance, especially for those who prioritize speed. While specific weight details are not provided for either model, the ASICS Gel-Pulse 17's design, which includes multiple cushioning technologies, may suggest a slightly heavier build compared to the Saucony Cohesion 14, which is likely optimized for a lighter, more fluid feel during runs. Runners aiming for speed may find the Saucony model to be more advantageous, while those seeking additional support might lean towards the ASICS option.

Aesthetics and Style

Aesthetics is often a subjective consideration, but it plays a role in the purchasing decision. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac colorway, which may appeal to those looking for a stylish yet functional running shoe. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 is available in a Black/Pink combination, offering a more classic and versatile look. Depending on personal style and color preference, one model may stand out more than the other for potential buyers.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize advanced cushioning technologies and are willing to invest a bit more, the ASICS may be the better choice. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still provides comfort and reliability, the Saucony could be the way to go. Both shoes have their strengths and are designed to support different types of runners, making your specific running style and budget key factors in your decision.