ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker is the more budget-friendly option, priced at $54.63, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes retail for $69.95. This makes the Saucony model about 22% cheaper than the ASICS, offering a significant saving for those looking to keep costs down while still investing in quality running shoes. Both shoes maintain a strong sales rank, with the ASICS at 12,467 and the Saucony at 22,129, which indicates a solid demand for both products.

Comfort Features

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with a focus on comfort, featuring Rearfoot GEL technology that absorbs shock and enhances cushioning. Additionally, it includes AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which provides a soft and comfortable ride. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 also prioritizes comfort through its VERSARUN cushioning, designed to absorb impact effectively. While both shoes offer cushioning technologies, the ASICS model emphasizes a more advanced shock absorption system, which may benefit runners who prioritize comfort during longer runs.

Breathability

Breathability is crucial for running shoes, and both models excel in this aspect. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper that contributes to breathability, while the Saucony Cohesion 16 incorporates a light and breathable mesh upper as well. This means both shoes will keep your feet feeling fresh and cool during runs. However, the ASICS model mentions a specific focus on advanced moisture management and breathability with its OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner, possibly giving it a slight edge in moisture control.

Durability

Durability is a key factor for any running shoe, and both the ASICS and Saucony models are built to withstand regular use. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole, which is designed for longevity and traction. Similarly, the Saucony Cohesion 16's rubber outsole is inspired by trusted styles, designed to offer a smooth feel and stand up to miles of wear. While both shoes are aimed at durability, the ASICS brand's focus on shock absorption and comfort may suggest that it could perform better over the long haul in terms of overall wear.

Fit and Sizing

In terms of fit, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with no-sew details to enhance comfort and fit, making it a solid choice for runners looking for a snug but comfortable experience. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 promotes a comfortable and secure fit, emphasizing a smooth transition from heel to toe. While both shoes aim to provide an excellent fit, the ASICS model's additional focus on fit enhancements could appeal to those with specific comfort needs.

Style and Aesthetics

Aesthetically, both shoes offer appealing designs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac colorway, presenting a stylish look that combines functionality with fashion. In comparison, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 is available in a Mist/Indigo color scheme, which is equally attractive and trendy. While personal preference will ultimately dictate which shoe looks better to the buyer, both brands have crafted shoes that are visually appealing and suitable for casual wear beyond just running.

Performance on the Track

Performance-wise, both shoes are equipped to handle running demands. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is known for its shock-attenuating technology, which can significantly enhance performance on various terrains. The Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 also delivers a smooth transition, making it suitable for daily runs. The difference in technologies—such as the ASICS' AMPLIFOAM PLUS and the Saucony's VERSARUN—may influence a runner's choice depending on their specific performance needs, such as preference for cushioning versus stability.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker ultimately depends on your priorities. If budget is a primary concern, the Saucony model offers a cost-effective choice at $54.63, about 22% less than the ASICS. However, if advanced comfort and shock absorption are paramount for your running experience, the ASICS model may be worth the investment at $69.95. Both shoes excel in breathability and durability, making either a solid choice for running enthusiasts.