ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5
Updated August 2026 — Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5 leads on breathability and traction.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers a budget-friendly option with excellent comfort, while the Saucony Women's Guide 18 excels in stability and support.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is $30 cheaper than Saucony
Cushioning
ASICS features AMPLIFOAM PLUS for comfort
Sales Rank
ASICS has a sales rank of 12,467
Why Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5 is better
Stability
Saucony provides TPU guidance for overpronation
Durability
Saucony has a rubber outsole for multi-surface grip
Breathability
Saucony features an engineered mesh upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | Gel-Pulse 17 | Guide 18 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Upper | Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, making them about 30% cheaper than the Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, which retails for $99.95. This price difference may influence budget-conscious shoppers seeking comfortable running shoes. The ASICS model not only provides a more economical option but also boasts a sales rank of 12,467, indicating a fair level of popularity among consumers. In contrast, the Saucony has a slightly better sales rank at 10,493, suggesting it may be a more favored choice amongst runners looking for stability.
Comfort Features
Both shoes prioritize comfort, but they do so in different ways. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, designed to provide a soft and comfortable ride, while the Saucony Women's Guide 18 incorporates PWRRUN cushioning, which offers long-lasting softness and energy return. This means that while the ASICS focuses on a plush feel, the Saucony aims to deliver a responsive experience. The ASICS model includes Rearfoot GEL technology for shock absorption, while the Guide 18 boasts a durable outsole designed for excellent traction. This difference may appeal to runners who value either soft cushioning or a more responsive feel during their runs.
Stability and Support
When it comes to stability and support, the Saucony Women's Guide 18 outshines the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17. The Guide 18 is specifically designed as a stability running shoe, featuring a TPU guidance frame that helps correct mild overpronation. This makes it an ideal choice for runners who need reliable support on longer runs. Conversely, the ASICS model does not explicitly mention stability features, focusing instead on comfort and cushioning. For runners prone to overpronation, the added stability of the Saucony may make it the better option.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac HINT colorway, while the Saucony Women's Guide 18 is available in a White/Mist combination. The breathable mesh upper of the Saucony enhances ventilation and offers a snug fit, which is essential for maintaining comfort during runs. On the other hand, the ASICS model also features a mesh upper but emphasizes a more traditional aesthetic. Individuals who prioritize modern design and ventilation might lean towards the Saucony, while those who prefer a classic look may opt for the ASICS.
Durability and Traction
Durability is a significant factor for runners, and both models offer solid constructions. The Saucony Women's Guide 18 features a rubber outsole built for durability and multi-surface grip, enhancing its performance on various terrains. This makes it a suitable choice for those who train on both roads and tracks. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, while durable, focuses more on comfort and cushioning rather than explicit traction features. For runners who frequently traverse different surfaces, the enhanced durability of the Saucony could be a deciding factor.
Breathability
Breathability is crucial for maintaining comfort during workouts, especially in warmer conditions. The Saucony Women's Guide 18 is designed with an engineered mesh upper that enhances ventilation, keeping your feet cooler during runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 also features a mesh upper, which contributes to breathability but lacks the specific emphasis on ventilation that the Saucony provides. For those who prioritize breathability in their running shoes, the Saucony may be the superior choice due to its engineered mesh design.
Weight
Weight can significantly impact a runner's performance, and here the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 likely has an edge, although specific weight information is not provided. The lightweight stability of the Saucony Women's Guide 18 suggests it is designed for comfort and support without feeling heavy. Runners who prefer a lighter shoe for speed may find the ASICS more appealing, especially given its emphasis on comfort and cushioning. However, the Saucony’s stability features may justify its weight for those prioritizing support over speed.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Saucony Women's Guide 18 depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that prioritizes comfort with a plush feel, the ASICS at $69.95 is a compelling choice. However, if you require enhanced stability and support for mild overpronation and are willing to invest a bit more at $99.95, the Saucony is likely the better option. Both shoes have their strengths and cater to different types of runners, so consider your running style and preferences before making a decision.

