vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9

Updated August 2026 — Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 leads on cushioning and style.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers a budget-friendly option with solid comfort, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 excels in cushioning for serious runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Price

ASICS is $50 cheaper than Saucony.

Sales Rank

ASICS has a better sales rank at 12,467.

Weight

ASICS is lighter, making it easier for casual wear.

Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better

Cushioning

Saucony features premium PWRRUN+ foam for superior comfort.

Durability

Saucony's outsole is designed for high-abrasion conditions.

Fit

Saucony's engineered mesh adapts better to foot shape.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
75
Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
BrandASICSSaucony
ModelGel-Pulse 17Triumph 22
UpperMeshEngineered Mesh
OutsoleMolded RubberHigh-abrasion Rubber
Cushioning TypeAMPLIFOAMPWRRUN+

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, which is priced at $119.95. This price difference could be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for reliable running shoes. While the Saucony option is positioned as a premium sneaker, the lower price of the ASICS offers a more accessible choice without sacrificing essential features for everyday running and fitness activities.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, both the ASICS and Saucony shoes excel, but they approach it differently. The ASICS shoes incorporate Rearfoot GEL technology and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which provide a soft ride and effective shock absorption. This makes them suitable for casual wear and light running. On the other hand, the Saucony Triumph 22 features premium PWRRUN+ foam that maximizes cushioning and energy return, catering to those who prioritize comfort during long runs. While the ASICS focuses on a balance of comfort for day-to-day wear, the Saucony is designed for serious runners who need advanced cushioning during extended use.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 sports a Gravel/Lilac color scheme that is both stylish and versatile for various outfits. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 features a Vapor/Moon color combination that leans towards a more modern and sleek aesthetic. Both shoes are visually appealing, but the choice between them may come down to personal style preferences. The design of the Saucony may resonate more with those seeking a contemporary look, while the ASICS offers a classic appeal.

Fit and Breathability

The fit and breathability of both running shoes are designed for comfort during wear. The ASICS features a mesh upper that enhances breathability while ensuring a snug fit, which helps in moisture management. The Saucony Triumph 22 takes fit to the next level with an engineered mesh upper that adapts to the foot's shape, providing a secure and irritation-free experience. This added adaptability may be particularly beneficial for runners who experience discomfort with standard fit shoes. Overall, if breathability and a custom fit are paramount, the Saucony may have the edge.

Durability and Outsole Performance

In terms of durability, the ASICS running shoes come equipped with a molded rubber outsole, which is designed to withstand regular wear and tear. While the Saucony Triumph 22 also features a durable rubber outsole, it is specifically engineered for high-abrasion conditions, offering reliable traction on various surfaces. This makes the Saucony a better option for those who frequently run on urban terrains or treadmills. Both shoes are built to last, but the enhanced grip of the Saucony could lead to a more secure running experience.

Performance and Usage

The performance characteristics of both shoes cater to different types of activities. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is ideal for everyday wear and light running, thanks to its comfortable cushioning and versatile design. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 targets serious runners, offering advanced features like a smooth transition and superior shock absorption, making them suitable for long-distance running and daily training. This difference in focus means that the performance aspect will largely depend on the user's specific needs and running habits.

Sales Rank and Popularity

When looking at sales ranks, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 holds a better position with a sales rank of 12,467, compared to the Saucony Women's Triumph 22, which stands at 34,383. This suggests that the ASICS model is more popular among consumers, potentially indicating a higher level of customer satisfaction or market demand. However, the Saucony's positioning as a premium product may attract a different segment of consumers who are willing to invest in higher-priced running shoes.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that provides comfort for casual wear and light running, the ASICS is a solid choice at $69.95. Conversely, if you are a serious runner seeking maximum cushioning and performance for long distances, the Saucony Triumph 22 at $119.95 offers advanced features that justify its higher price. Evaluate your running habits, budget, and style preferences to determine which shoe aligns best with your lifestyle.