vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on price and cushioning, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, wins on weight and durability.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 excels in cushioning and comfort, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 offers better value and versatility.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Cushioning

ASICS features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for a softer ride.

Shock Absorption

ASICS has Rearfoot GEL technology for excellent shock absorption.

Style

ASICS offers a vibrant color scheme.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better

Price

Under Armour is priced at $54.95, making it more budget-friendly.

Weight

Under Armour is lighter at 8.9 oz, enhancing agility.

Durability

Under Armour has synthetic overlays for better durability.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
78
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
BrandASICSUnder Armour
ModelGel-Pulse 17Charged Assert 10
Sales Rank124675952
Upper MaterialMeshBreathable mesh
MidsoleAMPLIFOAM PLUSCharged Cushioning
OutsoleMolded rubberSolid rubber

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are designed for comfort and performance, featuring advanced cushioning technology. Priced at $69.95, they offer a solid option for runners looking for reliability in their footwear. One of the standout features is the Rearfoot GEL technology, which provides excellent shock absorption, making it ideal for those long runs or daily wear. With a bestseller rank of 12,467, they reflect a moderate popularity among consumers, indicating they are a trusted choice for many runners.

Overview of Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10

In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is priced at $54.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the ASICS model. These shoes cater to runners seeking versatility and flexibility, thanks to the Charged Cushioning midsole. This technology enhances responsiveness and durability, appealing to those who prioritize a lightweight feel. With a bestseller rank of 5,952, they are notably more popular, suggesting a strong preference among buyers for their design and performance.

Comfort and Cushioning Comparison

When it comes to comfort, both shoes utilize different technologies to enhance the running experience. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which aims to provide a softer ride compared to standard cushioning. This can be particularly beneficial for runners who log in many miles or require additional shock absorption. On the other hand, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 uses EVA sockliner and Charged Cushioning for a responsive feel, which is effective for those who prefer a more dynamic running experience. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the ASICS model leans more towards plush cushioning.

Weight and Flexibility

The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is designed to be lightweight, weighing in at 8.9 oz, which contributes to its agility on the track. This shoe is particularly appealing for runners who value speed and nimbleness. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 does not specify its weight, but it is notable that lighter shoes generally offer better performance for speed-focused runners. The flexibility of the Under Armour model promotes a natural foot movement, making it suitable for various running styles.

Durability and Support

Durability is another crucial aspect to consider when comparing these running shoes. The Under Armour Charged Assert 10 boasts synthetic overlays that enhance its durability and support, making it a reliable choice for longer wear. Additionally, it features a solid rubber outsole that covers high-impact zones, reducing wear and tear over time. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 also includes a molded rubber outsole but focuses more on cushioning than on durability features. While both models are designed to withstand regular use, the Under Armour shoe may offer slightly better durability due to its construction.

Breathability and Fit

Breathability is essential for any running shoe, and both the ASICS and Under Armour models excel in this regard. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features a mesh upper that allows for airflow, keeping your feet cooler during runs. Similarly, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 also incorporates a lightweight, breathable mesh upper, ensuring comfort and ventilation. Fit is subjective, but the ASICS model is designed with no-sew details, which may enhance comfort and reduce irritation during extended wear. The fit of the shoes can significantly affect performance, so trying them on is advisable to see which suits you better.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of style, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a more vibrant look. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is available in a sleek Black/Black/White design, catering to those who favor a classic aesthetic. Style can be a deciding factor for many buyers, so it’s essential to choose a pair that aligns with your personal taste in athletic wear.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize cushioning and comfort for long distances, the ASICS model may be the better option, despite its higher price of $69.95. However, if you seek a lightweight shoe that offers versatility and is more budget-friendly at $54.95, the Under Armour model stands out as an excellent choice. Both shoes deliver essential features for runners, but your decision should align with your running style and preferences.