ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs YHOON Womens Slip on Walking Shoes Comfort Lightweight
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on price and performance, YHOON Womens Slip on Walking Shoes Comfort Lightweight wins on versatility and breathability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes offer superior performance and cushioning for runners, while the YHOON slip-ons provide a budget-friendly, versatile option for casual wear.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Performance
Advanced cushioning and support for running.
Durability
Engineered for serious runners.
Sales Rank
Higher rank in the running shoe market.
Why YHOON Womens Slip on Walking Shoes Comfort Lightweight is better
Price
Significantly cheaper option.
Versatility
Suitable for various casual activities.
Breathability
Mesh upper promotes airflow.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | YHOON Womens Slip on Walking Shoes Comfort Lightweight |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | Basic cushioning |
| Outsole | Molded rubber | EVA outsole |
| Weight | Lightweight | Very lightweight |
| Usage | Running | Casual |
| Breathability | Moderate | High |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, while the YHOON Womens Slip on Walking Shoes are significantly cheaper at $19.99, making them about 71% less expensive. This substantial price difference may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers looking for functional footwear without breaking the bank. While the ASICS shoes are designed for running with advanced cushioning technologies, the YHOON slip-ons serve as a versatile and economical option for various casual activities. This pricing disparity sets the stage for a deeper look at the features and benefits of each shoe.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes feature advanced AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which offers a softer ride compared to standard cushioning materials. This design is particularly beneficial for runners who seek shock absorption during their workouts. The GEL technology in the midsole further enhances comfort by mitigating impact. On the other hand, the YHOON slip-on shoes prioritize a lightweight and breathable experience with their mesh upper, designed to keep feet cool and dry. While both shoes aim to provide comfort, the ASICS model is more suited for dedicated running, whereas the YHOON shoes cater to casual wear and light activity.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes features a modern aesthetic with a gravel/lilac color scheme, appealing to those who appreciate a blend of style and functionality. The YHOON slip-ons, available in pink, offer a more casual and vibrant look, making them suitable for everyday wear. Both shoes have their unique charm, but the ASICS design leans more towards performance-focused aesthetics, while the YHOON shoes cater to a fashion-forward casual audience. This difference in design approach can influence a buyer's decision based on their intended use and personal style.
Versatility
The YHOON Womens Slip on Walking Shoes excel in versatility, suitable for a wide range of activities including shopping, walking, and light exercise. Their easy slip-on design allows for quick wear, making them an excellent choice for those on the go. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are specifically engineered for running, with features that enhance performance during this activity. While both shoes serve different primary purposes, the YHOON shoes stand out for their multifunctionality, accommodating various casual and active scenarios.
Breathability and Material
Breathability is a standout feature of the YHOON slip-ons, thanks to their mesh upper, which promotes airflow and keeps feet comfortable during extended wear. This is particularly beneficial for warmer climates or during physical activities that generate heat. The ASICS model also incorporates breathable materials, but their focus on cushioning and support may not prioritize airflow to the same extent as the YHOON shoes. As a result, for those seeking breathability as a key feature, the YHOON slip-ons present a compelling advantage.
Performance and Support
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are engineered with features like rearfoot GEL technology and a molded rubber outsole that enhance shock absorption and traction. This makes them ideal for serious runners who require reliable support and durability during their runs. In comparison, the YHOON slip-ons offer a non-slip EVA outsole designed for general support, but they may not provide the same level of performance for extensive running or sports. Thus, for dedicated athletes, the ASICS model is clearly the superior choice.
Customer Reception
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes have a bestseller rank of 12,467, indicating a solid but not overwhelming popularity in the running shoe market. Meanwhile, the YHOON slip-on shoes hold a better rank at 7,406, suggesting they resonate well with consumers looking for everyday footwear. This difference in sales rank may reflect varying customer needs, with the YHOON shoes appealing to a broader audience seeking affordable comfort, while the ASICS brand caters more to niche running enthusiasts.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the YHOON Womens Slip on Walking Shoes depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are an avid runner looking for advanced cushioning and support, the ASICS model is the better investment at $69.95. However, if you prefer a more budget-friendly option that offers versatility for casual use, the YHOON slip-ons at $19.99 are hard to beat. Each shoe serves its purpose well, but understanding your own requirements will help you make the best choice.

