vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 Running Shoes, 8, vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 Running Shoes, 8, wins on traction and price, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US wins on breathability and comfort.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 offers better value and superior grip for trail running, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 excels in breathability and comfort for pavement running.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 Running Shoes, 8, is better

Price

ASICS is $3 cheaper than Under Armour

Traction

ASICS has a trail-specific outsole for better grip

Waterproof

ASICS features a waterproof upper for versatility

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US is better

Breathability

Under Armour has a lightweight mesh upper

Cushioning

Under Armour offers a plush step-in feel

Midfoot Support

Under Armour includes reinforced overlays for stability

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 Running Shoes, 8,
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 Running Shoes, 8,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US
BrandASICSUnder Armour
Price$54.95$57.95
Sales Rank13382002
CushioningAMPLIFOAMCharged Cushioning
UpperMesh + WaterproofLightweight Mesh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 Running Shoes, 8,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 Running Shoes are priced at $54.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, which retails for $57.95. When considering value, the price difference may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers. While both shoes are competitively priced within the realm of running shoes, ASICS offers a more economical option without sacrificing essential performance features. Additionally, the average price over the last 90 days for the ASICS model is $59.47, while the Under Armour has averaged $63.54, further highlighting the ASICS as the more budget-friendly choice.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 showcases a sleek black and graphite grey aesthetic, ideal for both casual and athletic wear. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, presented in a black and white color scheme, offers a classic yet modern look. Both designs prioritize functionality, but the ASICS model incorporates a waterproof upper, which enhances its versatility for various weather conditions. The Under Armour, on the other hand, focuses on breathability with its lightweight mesh upper, making it suitable for warm-weather activities. Overall, both shoes are stylish, yet their designs cater to slightly different preferences and needs.

Comfort and Fit

The ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 is designed for comfort with its rearfoot GEL technology, which improves impact absorption, alongside AMPLIFOAM cushioning for a softer feel. Conversely, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 features a charged midsole that provides balanced impact protection and a plush step-in feel, making it ideal for newer runners. The ASICS model emphasizes a comfortable footstrike, while the Under Armour prioritizes a cushioned ride. Both models offer features aimed at enhancing comfort, but those who require specialized cushioning may find the ASICS more appealing due to its GEL technology.

Breathability and Temperature Control

Breathability is a key factor in running shoes, and both models have attributes that cater to this. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 boasts a lightweight mesh upper designed to enhance airflow, keeping feet cooler during workouts. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10, while offering breathability, also includes a waterproof upper. This means that while the ASICS can handle wet conditions, it may not provide the same level of airflow as the Under Armour. For runners in hot climates, the Under Armour's focus on breathability could make it the preferred option.

Support and Stability

When it comes to support and stability, the ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 features a trail-specific outsole pattern that enhances grip on various surfaces, making it suitable for diverse terrains. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 includes reinforced overlays for midfoot support, helping to keep the foot centered during runs. While both shoes provide adequate support, the ASICS is better suited for off-road conditions, whereas the Under Armour offers stability ideal for pavement or treadmill runs. Runners should consider their usual environment when choosing between these two models.

Traction and Outsole Performance

Traction is crucial for running shoes, and both models deliver in this area. The ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 comes with a trail-specific outsole pattern that improves grip on uneven surfaces, making it a strong choice for trail running. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 features a rubber outsole with a flexible tread pattern, designed for steady movement on pavement or treadmills. While both shoes provide reliable traction, those who frequent trails will appreciate the superior grip offered by the ASICS. Conversely, urban runners may find the Under Armour's design more suitable for their needs.

Brand Reputation

ASICS and Under Armour are both reputable brands in the athletic footwear market. The ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 holds a bestseller rank of 1338, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 ranks slightly lower at 2002. This ranking indicates that the ASICS model is more popular among consumers, potentially reflecting its effectiveness and customer satisfaction. Brand reputation can play a significant role in purchase decisions, with many runners preferring to invest in a shoe that has garnered a loyal following.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Venture 10 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option with superior grip for trail running, the ASICS may be the better choice. On the other hand, if breathability and a cushioned ride are your priorities, especially in warmer conditions or on pavement, the Under Armour could be more appealing. Both models offer excellent features and comfort, so consider your running style and environment to make the best decision for your footwear needs.