ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide leads on comfort and style.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers better affordability and breathability, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels in comfort and cushioning.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $60 cheaper than Brooks.
Breathability
ASICS features a lightweight mesh upper.
Weight
ASICS is designed for agility with a lightweight construction.
Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better
Cushioning
Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for enhanced comfort.
Fit
Brooks offers a more inclusive fit for orthotics.
Sales Rank
Brooks has a better sales rank at 2293.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Ghost Max 3 |
| Upper Material | Engineered mesh | Nylon lining |
| Cushion Type | FF BLAST | DNA LOFT V3 |
| Design | Sporty | Sleek |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and Brooks Women Ghost Max 3
In this comparison, we explore the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3. Both shoes are designed for runners but cater to slightly different preferences and needs. The ASICS model is priced at $99.95, making it more accessible than the Brooks model, which retails for $159.95. With a price difference of about 37%, the ASICS shoe could be more appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 showcases a sporty yet classic design with a Winter SEA/White color scheme, making it versatile for various outfits. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 features a sleek black and rose gold design that appeals to those looking for a modern aesthetic. Both shoes maintain a low-top design, providing a sleek silhouette that is popular among runners. While the ASICS focuses on a breathable mesh upper, the Brooks utilizes a nylon lining for added comfort, which may influence buyer preference based on style and material.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 integrates an engineered mesh upper and FF BLAST cushioning. This combination offers a cloud-like feel and responsive ride, essential for those long runs. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, on the other hand, employs nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning, providing enhanced comfort and accommodating orthotics. The Brooks model also features a more inclusive fit, which can be beneficial for runners needing extra room. This focus on fit and comfort may sway runners with specific needs towards the Brooks shoe.
Technology and Performance
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 incorporates a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, an adaptive stability system designed to enhance performance. This technology is particularly beneficial for runners seeking a stable platform during their runs. Conversely, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 boasts a high stack of cushioning, aimed at providing a softer landing and a more comfortable run. With its lower bestseller rank of 2293, the Brooks may attract those looking for a shoe that emphasizes performance and innovation.
Breathability and Moisture Management
Breathability is a crucial factor for running shoes, and the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 excels in this department thanks to its lightweight polyester upper. This feature reduces the need for additional overlays, allowing for better airflow during runs. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 does not specifically highlight breathability in its features, focusing instead on comfort with its EVA insole and rubber outsole. For runners prioritizing ventilation, the ASICS may be the better option.
Weight and Agility
The weight of a running shoe can significantly impact a runner's agility. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14, with its lightweight construction, promotes speed and agility on the track. While specific weight details are not provided, the emphasis on a lightweight mesh upper suggests that it is designed for nimbleness. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, while not explicitly labeled as lightweight, offers a high stack design that may add some bulk but also enhances cushioning. Runners focused on speed might prefer the ASICS model for its potential agility.
Price Comparison
Price is a pivotal factor in any comparison, and here, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 stands out at $99.95. This price point makes it about $60 cheaper than the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, which is priced at $159.95. This significant difference of approximately 37% could be a deciding factor for many buyers, especially those new to running or looking for a reliable shoe without breaking the bank. The ASICS, with its solid features at a lower price, presents a compelling case.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize affordability, breathability, and lightweight performance, the ASICS model is a strong contender. However, if comfort, fit, and advanced cushioning technology are more important to you, the Brooks model may be worth the additional investment. Both shoes have their unique strengths, catering to different types of runners, making this decision highly personal.

