vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on style, Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running wins on fit and support.

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers a more affordable and lightweight option, while the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 provides superior support and cushioning.

Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is $40 cheaper than Brooks.

Weight

ASICS is lighter, enhancing speed.

Design

ASICS has a sleek performance-oriented look.

Why Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running is better

Support

Brooks features advanced GuideRails technology.

Cushioning

Brooks uses BioMoGo DNA for superior comfort.

Fit

Brooks offers a roomier fit for various foot shapes.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running
90

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGT-1000 14Addiction GTS 15
ColorWinter SEA/WhiteOyster/Peacoat/Lilac Rose
Sales Rank1855821661
Upper MaterialEngineered Mesh3D Fit Print
Cushion TypeFF BLASTBioMoGo DNA

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are significantly more affordable at $99.95, making them about 29% cheaper than the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15, which retails for $139.95. This price difference of $40 is substantial, especially for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes. The lower price of the ASICS model could attract casual runners or those new to the sport who want to try out a reliable option without breaking the bank.

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 features a stylish Winter SEA/White color scheme, while the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 showcases a more colorful Oyster/Peacoat/Lilac Rose combination. The visual appeal of both shoes will attract different consumers based on personal taste. The ASICS design emphasizes a sleek, performance-oriented look, whereas the Brooks offers a vibrant, fashionable aesthetic that can easily transition from running to casual wear. Each shoe's design reflects its brand ethos, with ASICS focusing on performance and Brooks prioritizing comfort and style.

Comfort Features

Comfort is paramount in running shoes, and both models excel in this area, but they approach it differently. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 incorporates FF BLAST cushioning and a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for a responsive and stable ride. The Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15, on the other hand, utilizes BioMoGo DNA cushioning and GuideRails support technology, which adapts to the runner's stride and reduces joint movement. This innovative support maximizes comfort and helps prevent injuries, particularly in the knees. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model provides specialized features for those needing extra support.

Breathability and Fit

Breathability is crucial for long runs, and both shoes offer unique approaches. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 features an engineered mesh upper that enhances airflow, keeping feet cool during runs. In contrast, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 utilizes a breathable upper with 3D Fit Print technology, providing a perfect blend of stretch and structure. This design caters to runners who may have flat or high-volume feet, offering a roomier fit. While both shoes are designed for comfort, the Brooks model stands out for its adaptability to various foot shapes, making it a better choice for those with specific fit requirements.

Support and Stability

Support and stability are critical features for runners, especially for those who may overpronate or have specific foot needs. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 employs a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts on-demand, providing stability during runs. Conversely, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 is equipped with GuideRails technology, which focuses on reducing excess movement at the knees and providing protection where it's most needed. While both shoes offer excellent support, the Brooks model is particularly suited for runners who require more extensive support due to their foot mechanics.

Weight and Performance

Weight can significantly impact running performance, and here, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 has the edge with its lightweight design. While specific weights are not provided, the emphasis on a lightweight, breathable upper indicates that the ASICS model allows for quicker strides and enhanced speed. The Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15, while still supportive, may be slightly heavier due to its additional cushioning and structure. For competitive runners or those looking to improve their speed, the ASICS model may offer the performance advantage needed on race day.

Durability and Longevity

Both the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 are designed with durability in mind. The ASICS shoe features a durable synthetic rubber outsole, which is essential for traction and longevity. Meanwhile, the Brooks model's construction includes materials that are not only soft but also built to withstand the rigors of long-distance running. Consumers can expect both shoes to last through numerous miles, but the choice may depend on individual running styles and terrains.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific running needs. If you prioritize affordability, lightweight design, and a responsive ride, the ASICS model at $99.95 is a fantastic choice. However, if you require maximum support, a roomier fit, and advanced cushioning technology, the Brooks model, priced at $139.95, could be worth the investment. Consider your foot type, running habits, and budget to determine which shoe aligns with your running goals.