ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on breathability, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on support and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers great value and comfort, while the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX excels in waterproof protection and support. Choose based on your specific running needs.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $99.95, significantly cheaper than Brooks at $165.00.
Weight
ASICS has a lightweight design, enhancing speed.
Cushioning
ASICS features FF BLAST cushioning for a responsive ride.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Waterproof
Brooks has GORE-TEX for waterproof protection.
Support
Brooks includes Guiderails for enhanced stability.
Sales Rank
Brooks has a respected position in the market despite a lower rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX |
| Waterproof | No | Yes |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Support System | 3D GUIDANCE | Guiderails |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, making them about 40% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, which retails for $165.00. This significant price difference could be a crucial factor for budget-conscious runners. While the ASICS provide a great mix of comfort and stability, the higher price of the Brooks reflects its advanced features and waterproof protection, which may justify the investment for those who frequently run in wet conditions.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, both shoes prioritize support, but with different approaches. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 features FF BLAST cushioning and a rearfoot PureGEL technology, designed to deliver a cloud-like feel and responsive ride. This combination allows for a soft yet energized experience during runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX utilizes DNA LOFT v2 cushioning for a smooth ride and incorporates a Guiderails Holistic Support System to align your body’s natural motion. Runners looking for a snug fit may appreciate the ASICS’ engineered mesh upper, while those who prefer waterproof features might lean toward the Brooks.
Stability and Support
Stability is a strong suit for both models, but they achieve it in different ways. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 employs a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to the runner's movements, providing on-demand stability. In contrast, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed with a unique Guiderails system that helps keep excess movement in check, promoting a natural motion path. For runners who need additional support during their runs, the Brooks may be more appealing, especially as it is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, marking it as a health-conscious choice.
Weather Resistance
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX has a distinct advantage when it comes to weather resistance, featuring GORE-TEX Invisible Fit technology for breathable waterproof protection. This makes it ideal for runners who face rain or wet conditions regularly. While the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is designed to handle a variety of environments, it does not provide the same level of protection against the elements, making the Brooks a superior option for those who prioritize weatherproof capabilities in their footwear.
Weight and Breathability
Weight and breathability are critical factors for runners looking to enhance their performance. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is constructed with a lightweight polyester upper, which contributes to its breathability during runs. This feature is essential for maintaining comfort over longer distances. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, while also built with an engineered air mesh upper, may weigh slightly more due to its waterproofing features. Runners focused on speed and airflow might prefer the ASICS, while those willing to trade off some lightness for waterproof protection may opt for the Brooks.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetic choice is subjective, but it plays a role in consumer preference. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is available in a Winter SEA/White color scheme, which provides a fresh and clean look. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX combines Black with Knockout Pink and Aqua accents, offering a more vibrant and sporty appearance. Depending on personal style, runners may find one shoe more visually appealing than the other, which could influence their purchasing decision.
Sales Rank
When considering sales rank, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 has a bestseller rank of 18,558, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ranks slightly lower at 22,780. This suggests that the ASICS may have a broader appeal among consumers, potentially due to its lower price point and favorable comfort features. However, the Brooks is still a respected choice, particularly for those needing waterproof and supportive footwear, indicating that both shoes have carved out their respective markets.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly option that offers comfort and stability, the ASICS at $99.95 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize waterproof protection and advanced support technologies, the Brooks, priced at $165.00, may be worth the investment. Consider your running environment, personal comfort preferences, and budget when making your decision.

