ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & leads on support and durability.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers a more budget-friendly option with solid features, while the Brooks Women's Ariel GTS 24 excels in comfort and support.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Lower Price
ASICS is $20 cheaper than Brooks.
Lightweight
ASICS features a lightweight design.
Responsive Ride
ASICS offers a cloud-like cushioning.
Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better
Comfort
Brooks has nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning.
Support
Brooks features GuideRails technology for stability.
Popularity
Brooks has a higher sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Ariel GTS 24 |
| Cushioning Type | FF BLAST | DNA LOFT v3 |
| Stability Tech | 3D GUIDANCE | GuideRails |
| Sales Rank | 18558 | 3616 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, while the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is listed at $119.95, making the ASICS shoes about 17% cheaper than their Brooks counterpart. This price difference could be a significant factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for good running shoes. Although both shoes offer great features and support, the more affordable price of the ASICS may appeal to those who want quality without breaking the bank.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Ariel GTS 24 showcase appealing aesthetics, but they cater to different tastes. The ASICS features a Winter SEA/White colorway, presenting a fresh and vibrant look, suitable for various running outfits. Conversely, the Brooks shoe comes in a more earthy palette of Coconut/Chateau/Portabella, which may attract those preferring neutral tones. While both designs are functional, the choice ultimately depends on personal style preferences.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, the Brooks Ariel GTS 24 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, promising a soft and durable experience that adapts to your unique stride. This shoe is engineered to offer a roomy fit, making it ideal for those seeking maximum support, especially for longer runs or walks. On the other hand, the ASICS GT-1000 14 integrates FF BLAST cushioning, providing a cloud-like feel alongside a responsive ride. While both shoes offer comfort, the Brooks may suit those needing extra room and support.
Stability Features
Stability is a crucial factor for many runners, and both shoes provide innovative solutions. The Brooks Ariel GTS 24 incorporates GuideRails technology, designed to help maintain a natural motion path and limit excess joint movement, making it an excellent choice for those prone to overpronation. In comparison, the ASICS GT-1000 14 utilizes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM to deliver on-demand stability through its platform geometry. While both shoes offer solid stability features, the Brooks model may be more appealing to individuals needing additional support during their runs.
Technology and Innovation
Technologically, both shoes offer advanced features that enhance the running experience. The Brooks Ariel GTS 24 is recognized as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating its suitability for those with specific foot health needs. The ASICS GT-1000 14, while not explicitly mentioned in terms of certifications, includes advanced materials like engineered mesh for breathability and a Hybrid Max Lite sockliner for moisture management. Both brands innovate in their own right, but the Brooks shoe’s certifications add an extra layer of assurance for those with particular health considerations.
Performance on Various Surfaces
Performance-wise, both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Ariel GTS 24 are designed for running, but their features may lend themselves to different types of terrain. The ASICS model, with its durable synthetic rubber outsole, is well-suited for pavement runs and everyday miles, providing a reliable grip. The Brooks shoe, on the other hand, offers trusted stability and comfort that can cater to both running and walking, making it versatile for various activities. While both shoes perform well, the choice may depend on the primary use—running or walking.
Customer Popularity
In terms of customer popularity, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 has a higher sales rank at 3,616, compared to the ASICS GT-1000 14's rank of 18,558. This suggests that the Brooks shoe is more favored among consumers, potentially due to its reputation for comfort and support. However, the lower sales rank of the ASICS does not necessarily reflect its quality; it could simply mean it’s a newer model or less marketed. Customer preferences can vary widely, so it’s worth considering user reviews and experiences alongside the sales data.
Which should you buy?
When deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, consider your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option without sacrificing quality, the ASICS model at $99.95 stands out with its lightweight design and responsive cushioning. However, if maximum support and comfort are your top priorities—and you are willing to invest a bit more for features like the GuideRails technology—the Brooks Ariel GTS 24 at $119.95 may be the better choice. Ultimately, both shoes have unique strengths that cater to different types of runners, making your choice dependent on what aspects matter most to you.

