ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on fit and comfort.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers a more budget-friendly option with solid performance, while the Brooks Glycerin 21 excels in cushioning and comfort.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $15 cheaper than Brooks.
Stability
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 18558.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Comfort
Brooks offers supreme softness for long-distance runs.
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities beyond running.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Glycerin 21 |
| Sales Rank | 18558 | 29881 |
| Cushioning Type | FF BLAST | DNA Loft v3 |
| Support Type | Stability | Neutral |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe, which retails for $114.95. This price difference may be a significant factor for budget-conscious runners seeking quality footwear. While both shoes offer excellent features tailored for running, the ASICS model provides a more economical choice without sacrificing performance.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 features a Winter SEA/White color scheme, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 comes in a sleek Black/Grey/White combination. Both shoes exhibit a modern aesthetic suitable for both running and casual wear. The breathable engineered mesh upper of the ASICS model is designed for lightweight comfort, while the Brooks’ warp knit upper offers a flexible fit, promoting a soft feel against the foot. This design flexibility can be a deciding factor for runners who prioritize style alongside functionality.
Comfort and Cushioning
The comfort level of the ASICS GT-1000 14 is enhanced by FF BLAST cushioning, providing a cloud-like feel and responsive ride. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin 21 excels in providing supreme softness, boasting nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning for an ultra-comfortable experience. The Brooks shoe is particularly aimed at runners who seek maximum cushioning, ideal for long-distance runs. This focus on cushioning may appeal more to those who prioritize comfort on extended runs compared to the ASICS model, which offers a balance of support and responsiveness.
Stability Features
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 integrates a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that enhances stability through controlled deformation, making it a suitable option for runners who need extra support. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 offers neutral support, promoting smooth transitions with a broad platform for stability. Each shoe caters to different running styles; the ASICS model is better for those requiring adaptive stability, while the Brooks is designed for runners who prefer a neutral stance.
Breathability
Breathability is a crucial factor for any running shoe, and both models perform well in this aspect. The ASICS GT-1000 14 features an engineered mesh upper that enhances airflow and reduces overheating during runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin 21's new warp knit upper is also designed to be breathable while accommodating foot expansion and movement. Both designs effectively promote air circulation, but runners may prefer one over the other based on fit and feel during their workouts.
Weight and Build
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is built with a lightweight polyester upper and a durable synthetic rubber outsole, making it both light and robust for various running environments. While specific weights are not provided, the focus on lightweight materials suggests agility and ease of movement. The Brooks Glycerin 21, with its plush internal fit and soft transitions, may feel heavier due to the added cushioning. This difference can influence a runner's choice, particularly for those prioritizing speed over plush comfort.
Performance and Versatility
Both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Glycerin 21 are designed for performance, excelling in various running conditions. The ASICS model ranks at 18,558 in sales, indicating a solid presence in the market, while the Brooks Glycerin 21 ranks at 29,881, suggesting it is less popular among runners. However, the Glycerin 21 is noted for its versatility, suitable for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts. This broad usability may attract those looking for a multi-functional shoe, while the ASICS model remains focused on running performance.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe comes down to individual priorities. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that offers a solid blend of support, stability, and performance, the ASICS model at $99.95 is a compelling choice. However, if supreme cushioning and comfort are your top priorities and you are willing to invest a bit more at $114.95, the Brooks Glycerin 21 may be the better fit. Consider your running style and needs to make the best selection for your footwear.

