ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on stability, Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral wins on price and comfort.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers better value with its lower price and responsive ride, while the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 excels in comfort and smooth transitions.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $15 cheaper
Shock Absorption
Rearfoot PureGEL technology offers superior shock absorption
Stability
3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances stability during runs
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral is better
Comfort
DNA Tuned cushioning provides plush comfort
Fit
Accommodating fit moves with the foot
Popularity
Higher bestseller rank indicates more popularity
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST | DNA Tuned |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Flat Knit |
| Sales Rank | 18558 | 14424 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Support Type | Stability | Neutral |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22, which retails for $114.95. This price difference could influence budget-conscious consumers looking for a quality running shoe. While both shoes are positioned in the running category, the ASICS model provides a more attractive price point for those who are looking to maximize value without sacrificing performance.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS GT-1000 14 features a lightweight polyester upper with a breathable mesh material that aims to reduce the need for additional overlays. The clean Winter SEA/White colorway offers a stylish look. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 sports a sleek, flat knit upper that provides a blend of stretch and compression. Its white, grey, and black color scheme gives it a modern, sophisticated appearance. Both shoes emphasize comfort and style, but the unique upper designs cater to different aesthetic preferences.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS GT-1000 14 is equipped with FF BLAST cushioning that provides a blend of cloud-like cushioning and responsiveness. This shoe also features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that enhances stability during runs. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 utilizes DNA Tuned cushioning, which combines plush landings with energetic toe-offs thanks to its dual-size cell technology. The accommodating fit of the Brooks shoe is tailored to move with the foot, making it especially appealing for those who prioritize comfort in their footwear.
Performance Features
Performance-wise, the ASICS GT-1000 14 includes Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology. This feature aims to enhance shock absorption and provide a smoother ride. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 focuses on smooth transitions with a broad platform that stabilizes the foot. The cutting-edge DNA Tuned cushion offers responsive toe-offs, making it suitable for varied running environments. While both shoes offer advanced technologies, the ASICS model focuses more on shock absorption, whereas the Brooks emphasizes transition smoothness.
Target Audience
The ASICS GT-1000 14 is designed for runners seeking on-demand stability and comfort for everyday mileage. Its features cater to those who appreciate a responsive ride while maintaining a cloud-like feel. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22, with its neutral support and plush cushioning, is ideal for runners who want maximum comfort whether they are hitting the road or cross-training. Each shoe is tailored to different running styles and preferences, making them appealing to distinct audiences within the running community.
Sales and Popularity
The ASICS GT-1000 14 has a bestseller rank of 18,558, while the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 has a higher rank of 14,424. This indicates that the Brooks model may be slightly more popular among consumers. However, both shoes are well-regarded options in their category, and the sales rank can fluctuate based on various factors, including seasonal trends and availability. Consumers may consider these ranks when deciding which shoe to purchase, although personal fit and comfort should also play a significant role in the decision-making process.
Durability and Construction
Durability is a critical factor for running shoes, and both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 are constructed with quality materials. The ASICS model features a synthetic rubber outsole designed for longevity, paired with an engineered mesh upper that aids in breathability. The Brooks shoe also boasts an updated flat knit upper that combines stretch with compression, promising a comfortable yet durable fit. Both shoes are built to withstand the rigors of running, though the choice may ultimately depend on individual preferences regarding the type of cushioning and support required.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the decision between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 boils down to personal preferences and specific needs. The ASICS model is about 17% cheaper and offers a responsive ride with excellent shock absorption, making it a solid choice for those prioritizing value and stability. Meanwhile, the Brooks model excels in providing plush comfort and smooth transitions, appealing to runners who value an accommodating fit and plush cushioning. Ultimately, both shoes are high-quality options, and your choice should align with your running style and comfort preferences.

