ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on price and stability, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running wins on cushioning and durability.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 excels in stability and responsiveness, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav offers superior comfort and value.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Stability
ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability.
Cushioning
ASICS uses FF BLAST cushioning for a responsive ride.
Durability
ASICS has a synthetic rubber outsole for durability.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better
Price
New Balance is $19.96 cheaper.
Comfort
New Balance features plush Fresh Foam cushioning.
Popularity
New Balance has a higher sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Fresh Foam Roav |
| Weight | Light | Light |
| Heel Type | Standard | Ultra Heel |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | NDurance |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe is about 17% cheaper at $79.99. Both shoes cater to runners seeking comfort and support, but they diverge in features and brand philosophy. The ASICS model emphasizes stability and cushioning, while New Balance focuses on plush comfort and adaptability.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS GT-1000 14 employs FF BLAST cushioning, described as providing a cloud-like feel mixed with a responsive ride. This design aims to absorb impact effectively, supporting runners over long distances. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav features a fresh foam midsole that also prioritizes plush cushioning. However, it is specifically designed to absorb impact efficiently, making it an excellent choice for those who require comfort during their runs. Each shoe brings unique cushioning technology that targets different preferences in how support is delivered.
Stability and Support
Stability is a key feature of the ASICS GT-1000 14, thanks to its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which provides adaptive support tailored to the runner's needs. This system helps with controlled deformation, enhancing stability regardless of the terrain. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav utilizes an Ultra Heel design, which offers targeted support for a secure and comfortable fit. This feature focuses on ensuring the shoe wraps the foot snugly without compromising comfort, making it ideal for casual runners or those looking for a more relaxed fit.
Durability
In terms of durability, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav is equipped with NDurance outsole technology, designed to withstand the rigors of both road miles and everyday wear. This makes it a robust option for those who plan to use their shoes frequently. The ASICS GT-1000 14 also promises durability, featuring a synthetic rubber outsole that complements its lightweight upper. However, the focus of ASICS is more on the combination of comfort and control, meaning that while both shoes are durable, the New Balance may have the edge for wear over time.
Fit and Construction
The ASICS GT-1000 14 features a classic lace-up closure that allows for a customizable fit, which can be adjusted according to individual preferences. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav employs a bootie construction that wraps around the foot, providing a soft, sock-like feel. This design makes it easy to slip on and off, which some may find more convenient. While both shoes offer a good fit, the choice here boils down to whether a user prefers a traditional lacing system or a more modern, snug bootie style.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetically, both brands deliver attractive designs that cater to various tastes. The ASICS GT-1000 14 comes in a Winter SEA/White color combination, which may appeal to those who appreciate a fresher, bolder look. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav is available in a more subdued black/light aluminum color scheme, making it versatile for everyday wear. While preference is subjective, the color options reflect the brands' positioning; ASICS leans towards performance-driven styles, and New Balance leans more towards casual, everyday wear.
Sales Ranking and Popularity
In terms of market popularity, the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav has a higher sales rank of 2101 compared to the ASICS GT-1000 14, which stands at 18558. This difference suggests that the New Balance model is more favored among consumers, possibly due to its price point and comfort features. While sales rank is not the only indicator of quality, higher popularity often correlates with customer satisfaction and positive reviews.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is priced at $99.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav is available for $79.99. This price difference of $19.96 makes the New Balance model about 17% cheaper, providing an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. For those who prioritize value without sacrificing essential features, the New Balance may present a more appealing choice.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav largely depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize stability and a more responsive feel, the ASICS model could be the better option for you. However, if comfort, plush cushioning, and budget are your main concerns, the New Balance model stands out as a solid choice. Ultimately, both shoes offer valuable features, but their differences cater to distinct preferences within the running community.

