vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on stability and cushioning, Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, wins on breathability and style.

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers superior stability and cushioning, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is more budget-friendly. Choose based on your priorities.

Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Stability

ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better support.

Cushioning

ASICS has FF BLAST cushioning for a plush feel.

Popularity

ASICS is known for its advanced running technology.

Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better

Price

Nike is priced at $60, making it more affordable.

Breathability

Nike's upper is more breathable than its predecessor.

Market Rank

Nike has a better sales rank at 1608.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
BrandASICSNike
UpperEngineered MeshMesh
MidsoleFF BLASTFoam
OutsoleSynthetic RubberNike Design
CushioningCloud-likeComfort-focused

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes are significantly less expensive, retailing at $60.00 compared to the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, which are priced at $99.95. This makes the Nike option about 40% cheaper than ASICS. For budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes, the Revolution 8 provides a more economical choice without sacrificing essential features. Both shoes have their unique selling points, but if price is your primary concern, the Nike shoes are the clear winner in this category.

Brand Reputation

ASICS and Nike are two of the most recognized brands in athletic footwear, each with its loyal customer base. Nike's Revolution 8 has a bestseller rank of 1608, indicating a strong market presence and popularity among consumers. In contrast, the ASICS GT-1000 14, with a bestseller rank of 18558, suggests it is less popular in comparison. While both brands are reputable, Nike’s higher sales rank may reflect a broader appeal or more effective marketing strategies, making it a go-to choice for many runners.

Comfort and Fit

Comfort is a crucial factor when selecting running shoes, and both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and the Nike Revolution 8 excel in this area. The ASICS model features an engineered mesh upper designed to be lightweight and breathable, while the GT-1000 14 incorporates FF BLAST cushioning for a cloud-like feel and responsive ride. On the other hand, the Nike Revolution 8 also has a breathable mesh upper and a foam midsole that offers intuitive cushioning through comfort-focused rocker geometry. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS may provide a more plush experience due to its specialized cushioning technology.

Stability and Support

For runners, stability and support are essential, especially during long runs. The ASICS GT-1000 14 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to your foot's needs for on-demand stability. Additionally, it includes Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which offers a softer feel compared to standard GEL technology. The Nike Revolution 8, while comfortable, does not emphasize stability features to the same extent; it focuses more on providing a cushioned ride through its outsole design and flex grooves. Therefore, if you need extra support, the ASICS may be the better choice.

Breathability

Breathability plays a significant role in maintaining comfort during workouts. Both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and Nike Revolution 8 utilize mesh uppers to ensure airflow and keep your feet cool. However, the Nike model explicitly states that its upper is more breathable than the previous Revolution 7, indicating an improvement in airflow. While ASICS does offer a breathable design, Nike’s emphasis on enhancing breathability may make it a more attractive option for those concerned about heat buildup during intense runs.

Weight

Lightweight shoes can make a significant difference in running efficiency. The ASICS GT-1000 14 is designed with a lightweight polyester upper and an overall focus on reducing weight, which can enhance performance. While specific weights are not provided for either shoe, the emphasis on lightweight construction in both models suggests they are suitable for runners who prioritize speed. However, the ASICS might have a slight edge due to its engineered mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetic preference is subjective, but it can influence purchasing decisions. The ASICS GT-1000 14 comes in a Winter SEA/White colorway, while the Nike Revolution 8 is available in a Black/White-Iron Grey combination. Both designs are stylish and cater to different tastes, with ASICS leaning towards a more vibrant look and Nike offering a classic, understated option. Ultimately, your personal style will dictate which shoe is more appealing, but both brands are known for their trendy designs.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes ultimately depends on your priorities as a runner. If budget is your main concern, the Nike Revolution 8 stands out due to its lower price point of $60.00, making it about 40% cheaper than the ASICS model. However, if you value advanced stability features and superior cushioning for longer runs, the ASICS GT-1000 14 could be worth the extra investment at $99.95. Both shoes offer comfort and breathability, but the ASICS may be better suited for those who prioritize support and a plush feel, while the Nike is ideal for those looking for a more affordable, stylish option.