ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 leads on comfort and fit.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers better stability and a lower price, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 excels in cushioning and comfort.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $20 cheaper than Saucony
Stability
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better support
Weight
ASICS is lighter due to its design
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Cushioning
Saucony features PWRRUN+ foam for superior comfort
Breathability
Saucony's mesh adapts better to foot shape
Style
Saucony has a more modern aesthetic
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Triumph 22 |
| Weight | Light | Moderate |
| Outsole | Synthetic rubber | High-abrasion rubber |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are about 17% cheaper than the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker. Priced at $99.95, the ASICS model offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the Saucony, which retails for $119.95. This $20 difference might be significant for those looking to balance quality with cost, particularly if you're purchasing running shoes regularly. The price point of ASICS may attract budget-conscious consumers, while the higher price of the Saucony reflects its premium features and design.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker excels with its PWRRUN+ foam, designed for maximum cushioning and energy return. This feature enhances shock absorption, making it ideal for long runs and all-day wear. While the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 also offers comfort through its FF BLAST cushioning, which provides a blend of softness and responsiveness, it may not match the plush feel that Saucony users can expect. Both shoes aim to deliver comfort, but the Saucony seems to prioritize luxurious cushioning more distinctly.
Stability and Support
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are engineered with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, aimed at providing adaptive stability for a smooth ride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who need extra support during their runs. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 focuses on a neutral design with updated midsole geometry that promotes smooth transitions but may not offer the same level of stability as the ASICS. Thus, runners seeking enhanced stability may find the ASICS to be more suitable for their needs.
Breathability
When it comes to breathability, both shoes utilize engineered mesh uppers to enhance airflow and fit. The ASICS model features a lightweight mesh upper that minimizes overlays, which can be a plus for reducing heat during runs. Meanwhile, the Saucony's breathable mesh is specifically designed to adapt to the foot, reducing hot spots and irritation during extended wear. Both shoes provide a comfortable fit, but the ASICS may slightly edge out in terms of reducing excess heat due to its design approach.
Durability
Durability is a crucial factor in running shoes, and both the ASICS and Saucony models offer reliable features. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 incorporates a durable synthetic rubber outsole, which is essential for longevity on various surfaces. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 boasts a high-abrasion rubber outsole, ensuring long-lasting durability and dependable traction. While both shoes are built to withstand wear and tear, the specific materials may influence your choice depending on your running environment.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of style, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes come in a Winter SEA/White colorway that appeals to those looking for a classic yet modern look. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22, available in Vapor/Moon, presents a sleek and contemporary design that may attract those who prioritize aesthetics in their athletic footwear. Personal preference plays a significant role here, as each shoe brings its unique flair, catering to different tastes.
Performance in Real-World Conditions
Both running shoes are designed for real-world performance but cater to slightly different running styles. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is built for stability and control, making it an excellent option for runners who may require a bit more support during their workouts. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is ideal for neutral runners who appreciate plush cushioning and smooth transitions. Your running style and the type of terrain you frequent may significantly influence which shoe performs better for you.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker hinges on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize stability, budget-friendliness, and a lightweight design, the ASICS model is a strong contender at $99.95. However, if you're looking for plush cushioning, superior comfort for long runs, and are willing to invest an extra $20, the Saucony Triumph 22 may be worth considering at $119.95. Evaluating your running style, comfort preferences, and budget will help you make the best decision for your next pair of running shoes.

