ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on price and cushioning, Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, wins on weight and breathability.
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 offers superior technology and support, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is a budget-friendly option with good comfort.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Advanced Technology
ASICS features Rearfoot PureGEL technology.
Support
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for stability.
Cushioning
ASICS uses FF BLAST cushioning for a responsive ride.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, is better
Price
Under Armour is $48 cheaper.
Weight
Under Armour weighs 10.05 oz, making it lighter.
Immediate Comfort
Under Armour has a Deluxe Comfort System sockliner.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Under Armour |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Charged Surge 4 |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST | Charged Cushioning |
| Stability | 3D GUIDANCE | None |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is significantly cheaper at $51.95, making it about 48% less expensive. This price difference could be a key factor for budget-conscious buyers. The ASICS model, despite its higher price, may appeal to those looking for advanced features and technology, while the Under Armour option presents a more accessible choice without sacrificing essential performance aspects.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 boasts a Deluxe Comfort System sockliner that molds to the foot for ultimate step-in comfort. This feature aims to provide an immediate sense of comfort, making it ideal for runners who prioritize ease. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14, on the other hand, incorporates FF BLAST cushioning in its midsole for a cloud-like feel and responsive ride, focusing on delivering both comfort and performance during runs. Thus, while both models are designed for comfort, the ASICS may provide a more dynamic experience for serious runners.
Support and Stability
Support is a critical aspect of running shoes, and the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 excels with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which offers adaptive stability through its platform geometry. This technology is designed to enhance control and confidence on various surfaces. The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 provides a breathable mesh upper and enhanced cushioning around the ankle, but it lacks the same level of stability technology found in the ASICS model. Therefore, for runners needing extra support, the ASICS option may be the preferred choice.
Weight and Flexibility
The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 weighs 10.05 oz., making it a lightweight option for those who prioritize speed and agility. This shoe's design includes a durable rubber outsole that promotes flexibility, particularly during toe-off, which can benefit runners looking to improve their pace. Conversely, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 does not specify its weight, but its cushioned design may be slightly bulkier. Runners who value lightness in their footwear might lean towards the Under Armour model.
Breathability
Both shoes are designed with breathability in mind, but they approach it differently. The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 features a breathable mesh upper combined with synthetic overlays to offer structure and support, ensuring that feet remain cool during runs. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 also incorporates an engineered mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, contributing to its lightweight and breathable nature. While both shoes excel in breathability, the Under Armour model may provide a slight edge due to its enhanced structural support.
Performance and Technology
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 integrates advanced technologies like the Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, enhancing the cushioning experience. This shoe is tailored for runners who prioritize performance and responsiveness in their footwear. In contrast, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 features Charged Cushioning for all-day comfort, it may not offer the same level of advanced technology found in the ASICS model. Therefore, for performance-focused runners, the ASICS may stand out.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetics can significantly influence a buyer's decision. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is available in a stylish Winter SEA/White color combination, which may appeal to those looking for a fashionable yet functional running shoe. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 comes in a classic White/Distant Gray/Metallic Silver palette, presenting a more understated look. While both shoes have their unique style, the choice will largely depend on personal preference, with the ASICS offering a bolder option.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 ultimately depends on your running needs and budget. If you are looking for advanced cushioning, support, and stability, the ASICS model is the superior choice, despite its higher price of $99.95. However, if budget is a significant concern and you are seeking a reliable, comfortable shoe for casual running, the Under Armour option at $51.95 offers excellent value. Both shoes have their strengths, but your decision should align with your specific requirements in comfort, technology, and price.

