ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on sustainability and stability, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on cushioning and price.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers better value and sustainability, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin 21 excels in cushioning and comfort.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Price
ASICS is $15 cheaper than Brooks.
Sustainability
ASICS uses recycled materials.
Stability
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for stability.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Comfort
Brooks has a plush internal fit.
Neutral Support
Brooks provides neutral support for natural foot movement.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-2000 13 | Glycerin 21 |
| Weight | Light | Light |
| Upper | Jacquard mesh | Warp knit |
| Support Type | Stability | Neutral |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is priced at $99.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, which retails for $114.95. Both shoes cater to women looking for quality running footwear, but they offer distinct features and technologies that cater to different running styles and preferences.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features a sleek black and white color scheme that provides a classic look, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 showcases a modern black, grey, and white design. The Jacquard mesh upper of the ASICS shoe offers a supportive and comfortable fit, while the Brooks utilizes a warp knit upper that is breathable and flexible, providing a plush feel. Both designs emphasize comfort, but the Brooks shoe's internal stretch bootie aims to enhance the fit even further, adapting to the runner's movements.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 is renowned for its super-soft cushioning, thanks to the nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 technology. This shoe aims to provide a plush, comfortable experience, especially for long-distance runners. In contrast, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 includes Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which offers lightweight cushioning and softer landings. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model is specifically designed for those who seek maximum cushioning during their runs.
Stability and Support
Stability is a key factor in running shoes, and both models offer different approaches to support. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, designed to provide advanced stability for smoother strides. This shoe is ideal for runners who need extra support during their runs. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 is categorized as a neutral support shoe, focusing on soft transitions while promoting a natural foot movement. This makes it suitable for runners who prefer a more flexible and accommodating experience.
Environmental Considerations
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 has made strides in environmental sustainability, with at least 50% of its upper material made from recycled content. Additionally, the sockliner is produced using a dyeing process that significantly reduces water and carbon emissions. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 does not highlight any specific sustainable features in its design. For eco-conscious consumers, the ASICS shoe offers a more environmentally friendly option.
Performance in Running Conditions
For runners who frequently tackle various terrains, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is equipped with features that provide stability and comfort, making it suitable for different running conditions. The 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM helps runners navigate uneven surfaces with more confidence. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels in providing a smooth, cushioned experience on paved surfaces, making it an excellent choice for road running and cross training. Each shoe serves its purpose well but caters to slightly different environments.
Pricing and Value
At $99.95, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is a more budget-friendly option compared to the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, which costs $114.95. This pricing difference of $15 might appeal to runners looking for a high-quality shoe without breaking the bank. However, the Brooks shoe offers advanced cushioning and comfort features that some might find worth the additional investment. Depending on individual priorities, both shoes provide solid value within their respective price points.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and preferences. If you prioritize cushioning and a plush fit for long runs, the Brooks model may justify its higher price with superior comfort features. However, if you are looking for a more stable shoe with a focus on sustainability and a lower price point, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is an excellent choice. Both shoes have their strengths, and understanding your running style will help you make the best decision.

