vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on eco-friendliness and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on weight.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 excels in stability and eco-friendliness, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 is more budget-friendly and versatile.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is more expensive but offers advanced stability features.

Cushioning

ASICS features Rearfoot PureGEL technology for better cushioning.

Sustainability

ASICS uses at least 50% recycled materials.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better

Price

New Balance is more affordable at $69.99.

Versatility

New Balance is suitable for everyday use.

Comfort

New Balance has a precision-engineered knit upper for comfort.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
BrandASICSNew Balance
Upper MaterialJacquard meshKnit
MidsolePureGELFresh Foam
DropN/A8 mm
Eco-Friendly50% recycled3% bio-based

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is the more budget-friendly option, retailing at $69.99. In contrast, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, making it approximately 43% more expensive than its competitor. If you're looking to save money while still investing in quality running shoes, the Fresh Foam 680 V8 offers significant savings without compromising on performance.

Design and Comfort

In terms of design and comfort, both running shoes prioritize the runner’s experience but through different approaches. The ASICS GT-2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper that offers a supportive and comfortable foothold, while also utilizing at least 50% recycled content in its main upper material. This commitment to sustainability is complemented by a sockliner that enhances cushioning and reduces water usage during production. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 boasts a precision-engineered knit upper designed for maximum comfort and targeted ventilation, ensuring a sleek fit. While both shoes focus on comfort, the ASICS shoe emphasizes eco-friendliness and support.

Cushioning Technology

Cushioning is a critical aspect for runners, and both models shine in this area but with distinct technologies. The ASICS GT-2000 13 incorporates Rearfoot PureGEL technology, providing lightweight cushioning and softer landings, which is crucial for longer runs. Additionally, its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances stability, making it ideal for those who require extra support. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 utilizes Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, which is designed for an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride, with approximately 3% bio-based content to help reduce its carbon footprint. Both shoes excel in cushioning, but the ASICS model offers advanced stability features that may benefit runners with specific needs.

Performance and Versatility

When considering performance, the ASICS GT-2000 13 has a sales rank of 9,491, indicating it is a popular choice among runners, which speaks to its effective design and performance on the road. It is engineered for stability and comfort, making it suitable for various running conditions. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8, with a sales rank of 13,745, is also a versatile shoe that caters to everyday runs and workouts, making it ideal for casual wear as well. Both products are designed for performance, but the ASICS model may be better suited for serious runners looking for stability.

Sustainability Efforts

Sustainability is becoming increasingly important in the footwear industry, and both brands have made strides in this area. The ASICS GT-2000 13 is notable for its use of recycled materials, with at least 50% of the shoe's main upper made from recycled content, and a sockliner produced using a dyeing process that significantly reduces water usage and carbon emissions. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 incorporates approximately 3% bio-based content in its midsole foam, highlighting its commitment to renewable resources. While both shoes contribute to sustainability, ASICS appears to lead with a stronger emphasis on using recycled materials.

Fit and Sizing

Fit is a crucial factor for runners, and both shoes offer unique features to ensure a comfortable experience. The ASICS GT-2000 13 is designed to provide a supportive foothold, ideal for those who prefer a snug fit during their runs. This shoe's construction is aimed at enhancing stability, particularly for longer distances. Meanwhile, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 features a no-sew upper construction that provides a sleek fit and feel, catering to those who prioritize seamless comfort. Ultimately, the choice between a more supportive fit from ASICS and the sleek, seamless design from New Balance will depend on individual preferences.

Style and Aesthetics

Style can also play a role in your decision when choosing running shoes. The ASICS GT-2000 13 comes in a classic black and white color scheme that appeals to traditionalists who prefer a timeless look. Its design, while functional, maintains an understated elegance. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 has a more modern aesthetic with its knit upper, which is not only functional but also trendy, making it suitable for casual outings beyond running. If style is a priority, the choice may hinge on whether you prefer the classic appeal of ASICS or the contemporary flair of New Balance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a shoe that emphasizes stability, support, and eco-friendliness, the ASICS model may be the better option, despite its higher price tag of $99.95. However, if budget is a significant concern and you seek a versatile, comfortable shoe for everyday use, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 offers a compelling option at a more affordable price of $69.99. Both shoes are excellent in their own right, but your decision should reflect your priorities in performance, style, and sustainability.