vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running

Updated July 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on price, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running wins on versatility and comfort.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers advanced cushioning and sustainability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is more budget-friendly and versatile.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Cushioning

Advanced gel technology for softer landings

Sustainability

Made with recycled materials

Brand Reputation

Established brand with loyal following

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running is better

Price

Significantly lower cost

Versatility

Suitable for both running and casual wear

Popularity

Higher bestseller rank

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
78
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running
CushioningPureGEL technologyFresh Foam midsole
Upper MaterialJacquard meshBreathable mesh
ConstructionRecycled contentNo-sew construction
WeightLightweightLightweight
Sales Rank9491367

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $55.99, making it about 44% less expensive. Given the substantial difference in price, budget-conscious shoppers might find the New Balance option more appealing. Both shoes are designed for running and casual wear, but if price is a primary concern, the lower cost of the New Balance shoe could be a deciding factor.

Brand Reputation

ASICS and New Balance are both reputable brands in the running shoe market, each with a loyal following. The ASICS GT-2000 13 holds a bestseller rank of 9,491, indicating a solid demand among consumers. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is more popular, boasting a bestseller rank of 367. This suggests that the New Balance shoe has gained traction and positive reviews among users, potentially reflecting its appeal in terms of performance and style.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the ASICS GT-2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper that provides a supportive and comfortable foothold. It also includes rearfoot PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and softer landings. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 incorporates a fresh foam midsole designed to cushion every step with responsive comfort, alongside a breathable mesh upper for superior airflow. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the ASICS may offer a slight edge with its advanced gel technology for more cushioned landings.

Durability and Construction

The ASICS GT-2000 13 is engineered with at least 50% of its upper material made from recycled content, contributing to sustainability while maintaining durability. Additionally, the sockliner employs a solution dyeing process that significantly reduces water usage and carbon emissions. The New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 features a no-sew construction that reduces weight and enhances durability. Both shoes emphasize long-lasting wear, but the environmentally conscious design of the ASICS may appeal to eco-friendly consumers.

Breathability

Breathability is a crucial factor in running shoes, especially for long-distance runners. The ASICS GT-2000 13 offers a jacquard mesh upper that supports airflow and comfort during runs. Similarly, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is designed with a breathable mesh upper that keeps feet dry during intense sessions. While both options excel in breathability, the New Balance may have a slight advantage due to its focus on airflow, which is particularly beneficial for warmer weather conditions.

Versatility

When it comes to versatility, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 is designed not just for running but also for everyday wear, making it suitable for various activities. Its engineered athletic design caters to both performance and casual settings. The ASICS GT-2000 13, while primarily a running shoe, does not explicitly mention its versatility for everyday use. Thus, if you're looking for a shoe that transitions seamlessly from running to casual outings, the New Balance option may be the better fit.

Style and Aesthetics

Stylistically, both shoes present appealing designs. The ASICS GT-2000 13 comes in a classic black and white color scheme, offering a timeless look that pairs well with any athletic outfit. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi V4 features a more colorful palette with Summer Fog, Nimbus Cloud, and Light Gold Metallic, which may attract those looking to add a pop of color to their running gear. Depending on personal style preferences, one may find the aesthetic appeal of one brand more compelling than the other.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi V4 Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning technology and sustainability, the ASICS model may be worth the higher price tag. However, if budget and versatility are your primary concerns, the New Balance shoe offers excellent comfort and performance at a significantly lower price. Consider your running habits and style preferences to make the best choice for your needs.