vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White leads on stability and style.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers better sustainability and a lower price, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 excels in comfort.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is $20 cheaper than New Balance

Sustainability

ASICS uses recycled materials

Sales Rank

ASICS has a higher bestseller rank

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running is better

Comfort

New Balance features advanced cushioning

Fit

New Balance has an adjustable lace closure

Design

New Balance has a more vibrant color scheme

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running
CushioningRearfoot PureGELFresh Foam X
Upper MaterialJacquard meshSynthetic
OutsoleDurable rubberDurable rubber
WeightLightweightLightweight
DropN/A8 mm

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe offers a sleek, modern look with its black and white color scheme, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running Shoe features a striking combination of black, phantom, and angora tones. Both shoes are designed to be visually appealing, catering to different style preferences. The ASICS model utilizes a jacquard mesh upper, providing not only a contemporary aesthetic but also a supportive fit. In contrast, New Balance employs a lightweight synthetic material that complements its performance-oriented design. Each shoe reflects its brand's identity, appealing to distinct customer bases.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 is designed to deliver a plush experience with its Fresh Foam X midsole, which is touted as the most cushioned Fresh Foam experience available. This shoe promises incredible comfort, especially over long distances. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers a sockliner produced with a solution dyeing process, providing lightweight cushioning and softer landings. While both shoes emphasize comfort, the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 stands out with its advanced cushioning technology, potentially making it more suitable for runners who prioritize comfort in their footwear.

Performance Features

The performance features of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 include a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which enhance stability and cushioning, respectively. This makes it a solid choice for runners seeking support and a smoother stride. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 boasts durable rubber outsoles and an adjustable lace closure for a secure fit, ensuring reliability during runs. Each shoe has its unique performance features, with ASICS focusing on stability and cushioning, while New Balance emphasizes overall comfort and fit.

Sustainability

Sustainability is a notable aspect of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13, as at least 50% of its main upper material is made from recycled content, which helps reduce waste and carbon emissions. Furthermore, the sockliner's dyeing process significantly lowers water usage and carbon emissions. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 does not explicitly highlight sustainable practices in its materials or production. For environmentally conscious consumers, the ASICS model may be the more appealing choice given its commitment to reducing its ecological footprint.

Pricing

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is priced at $99.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14, which retails for $119.88. This price difference could be a significant factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. While both shoes are competitively priced within the running shoe market, the ASICS model offers a more affordable option without sacrificing essential features.

Sales Rank and Popularity

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 enjoys a bestseller rank of 9491, indicating its popularity among consumers. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 has a slightly lower bestseller rank of 13111. While both shoes are well-regarded, the higher sales rank of the ASICS model suggests a greater level of consumer trust and satisfaction, which could influence a buyer's decision.

Brand Reputation

Both ASICS and New Balance have established themselves as reputable brands in the running shoe market, known for their commitment to quality and performance. ASICS has a strong following among serious runners due to its focus on stability and support, while New Balance is celebrated for its comfort and innovative cushioning technologies. The choice between these two brands may ultimately come down to personal preference and past experiences, as both have their unique strengths.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize sustainability, stability, and a lower price point, the ASICS model may be the right choice for you. However, if you are seeking maximum comfort and cushioning for longer distances, the New Balance shoe could better meet your expectations. Both options have their merits, making them worthy contenders in the competitive running shoe market.