ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on stability and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe wins on breathability and weight.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers advanced stability and eco-friendly features, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 provides lightweight comfort at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Stability
ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability.
Eco-friendly
ASICS uses at least 50% recycled materials.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 9,491.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is priced at $85.40, making it cheaper.
Weight
New Balance emphasizes lightweight construction.
Style
New Balance features a trendy patchwork design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Material | Jacquard mesh | Breathable knit |
| Cushioning | PureGEL | Fresh Foam X |
| Stability | 3D GUIDANCE | None |
| Outsole | Rubber | Durable rubber |
| Eco-friendly | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe comes in at $85.40. This makes the New Balance option about 17% cheaper than the ASICS shoe. Price can be a significant factor for many buyers, especially if you’re looking for a great running shoe that fits your budget. While both shoes provide unique features, the cost difference may sway those who are price-sensitive or just starting their fitness journey.
Comfort and Fit
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is designed with a jacquard mesh upper, which offers a supportive and comfortable foothold. This shoe also features a rearfoot PureGEL technology that aids in providing lightweight cushioning and softer landings, making it a great option for longer runs. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 boasts a breathable knit upper that emphasizes comfort for daily runs. Both shoes are made to ensure comfort, but the ASICS may be slightly more focused on providing advanced stability, thanks to its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM.
Technology and Performance
When it comes to technology, the ASICS shoe features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that enhances stability for a smoother stride, while the New Balance shoe incorporates Fresh Foam X midsole technology for superior cushioning. This means that while the ASICS may cater more to runners needing stability, the New Balance focuses on cushioning, perfect for those who prefer a softer feel underfoot. The performance of each shoe is tailored to different preferences and running styles, making it crucial for buyers to consider what fits their needs best.
Durability
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 ranks 9,491 in sales, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 has a sales rank of 15,925. This suggests that the ASICS model may have a more established reputation for durability and performance over time. The ASICS shoe emphasizes its environmentally friendly design, using recycled materials, which could appeal to environmentally conscious consumers. Meanwhile, the New Balance shoe features a durable rubber outsole designed to ensure lasting performance, which is essential for frequent runners.
Style and Design
In terms of style, the ASICS shoe is presented in a classic black and white color scheme, which provides a timeless look suitable for various outfits. The New Balance shoe, on the other hand, features a stylish patchwork theme that could appeal to those looking for a trendy and fashionable running shoe. While both shoes cater to aesthetic preferences, the decision may ultimately depend on whether you value a classic look or a more modern design.
Weight and Flexibility
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is designed to provide lightweight cushioning, which helps reduce fatigue during longer runs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 is also noted for its lightweight construction, making it a solid choice for those who want a shoe that won't weigh them down. While both shoes aim to deliver flexibility and comfort, the choice between them may come down to personal preference regarding how much cushioning and support you desire during your runs.
Environmental Considerations
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is crafted with at least 50% of its main upper material sourced from recycled content. This environmentally friendly approach reduces waste and carbon emissions, aligning with the values of eco-conscious consumers. In contrast, the New Balance shoe does not highlight any specific sustainable practices in its design. For buyers who prioritize sustainability in their purchasing decisions, the ASICS shoe may have a distinct advantage.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you are looking for advanced stability and are willing to spend a bit more, the ASICS shoe may be the right choice for you. Alternatively, if you prefer lightweight comfort and a more stylish design at a lower price point, the New Balance option could be ideal. Each shoe has its strengths, and understanding these differences can help you make an informed decision that best suits your running lifestyle.

