ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on price and sustainability, Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, wins on breathability.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers advanced features for serious runners, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 provides comfort at a lower price. Choose based on your running needs.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Advanced Features
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and PureGEL technology.
Sustainability
ASICS uses at least 50% recycled content.
Stability
ASICS provides advanced stability for longer runs.
Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Nike is $39.95 cheaper.
Breathability
Nike has a more breathable mesh upper.
Lightweight
Nike offers a lighter overall design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White | Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Nike |
| Model | GT-2000 13 | Revolution 8 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Mesh |
| Midsole | PureGEL | Foam |
| Sales Rank | 9491 | 1608 |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When it comes to running shoes, both the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 offer unique features catering to different preferences. The ASICS model is priced at $99.95, while the Nike model is significantly cheaper at $60.00, making it about 40% less expensive. This difference highlights their positioning in the market, with ASICS targeting serious runners needing advanced features and Nike appealing to casual runners looking for comfort and affordability.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 boasts a sleek design with a black and white color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a classic look. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8, also in black and white with iron grey accents, offers a modern aesthetic. While both shoes are visually attractive, the choice may depend on personal style preferences. The ASICS model features a jacquard mesh upper that not only supports but also enhances comfort, whereas the Nike model focuses on breathability, making it ideal for warmer conditions.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 excels with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, providing advanced stability for a smoother stride. This is complemented by the rearfoot PureGEL technology, which ensures lightweight cushioning and softer landings. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 features a foam midsole that delivers intuitive cushioning, allowing for a comfortable experience throughout runs. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS model may be better suited for those seeking a more supportive fit during longer runs.
Performance Features
Performance-wise, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is equipped with a variety of advanced technologies. The rearfoot PureGEL technology and the jacquard mesh upper work together to enhance both cushioning and stability, making it an excellent choice for serious runners. The Nike Women's Revolution 8, however, also provides a solid performance with its comfortable foam midsole and breathable mesh upper, delivering a cushioned effect as you run. Despite its lower price, the Nike model still meets the needs of casual runners effectively.
Sustainability
Sustainability is an important factor for many consumers today. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features at least 50% recycled content in its main upper material, showcasing a commitment to reducing waste and carbon emissions. Additionally, its sockliner is produced using a solution dyeing process that decreases water usage by approximately 33% compared to conventional methods. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 does not highlight any specific sustainable features, which may be a consideration for environmentally conscious buyers.
Breathability and Temperature Control
Breathability is another critical aspect for runners, particularly in warmer climates. The Nike Women's Revolution 8 excels in this area with its mesh upper, offering a more breathable design than its predecessor, the Revolution 7. This feature helps keep feet cool during runs. While the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 also utilizes a jacquard mesh upper for comfort, its design focuses more on support and stability than on maximum breathability. Therefore, if you prioritize ventilation during your runs, the Nike model may be the better choice.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is priced at $99.95, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is available for $60.00. This makes the Nike model about 40% cheaper than its ASICS counterpart. For budget-conscious consumers or casual runners, this price difference could be a significant factor in their decision-making process. While the ASICS offers advanced features, those looking for a good value without sacrificing comfort might lean towards the more affordable Nike option.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 comes down to your specific running needs and budget. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced stability and cushioning features, the ASICS model may be worth the higher price. However, if you are a casual runner seeking comfort and breathability at a more affordable price, the Nike model stands out as a great option. Consider your running style, budget, and preference for sustainability to make the best choice for your needs.

