ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on breathability, Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide wins on style and fit.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers better breathability and stability features, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels in comfort and popularity.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $20 cheaper than Brooks
Breathability
Woven mesh upper promotes airflow
Stability
3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances stability
Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better
Popularity
Brooks has a higher sales rank
Comfort
Nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 provides enhanced comfort
Design
Sleek sporty style appeals to many consumers
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, | Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Material | Woven mesh | Nylon |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST MAX | DNA LOFT V3 |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber |
| Design | Low-top | Low-top |
| Fit | Standard | Inclusive |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and Brooks Women Ghost Max 3
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 offer distinct advantages for runners, making them both compelling choices in the running shoes category. Priced at $139.95, the ASICS model is about 17% cheaper than the Brooks, which retails for $159.95. This price difference may be a key factor for budget-conscious shoppers. Both shoes are designed to enhance the running experience, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a woven mesh upper in a striking Twilight Blue/White color combination. This design not only looks appealing but also promotes breathability, which is essential for keeping your feet dry during runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 boasts a sleek sporty style with a Black/Black/Rose Gold color scheme. Its unique construction adds more volume, aiming for an inclusive fit. Both shoes embody modern aesthetics, but the choice depends on individual style preferences.
Comfort and Fit
The comfort level of a running shoe can significantly impact performance, and both the ASICS GT-2000 14 and Brooks Ghost Max 3 excel in this area. The ASICS model incorporates a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to the foot's natural movements, providing stability and comfort. Additionally, its updated FF BLAST MAX cushioning offers cloud-like softness during landings. Conversely, the Brooks Ghost Max 3 features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for enhanced comfort and a lace-up design for a secure fit. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS may offer slightly better adaptability due to its advanced stability system.
Performance Features
Performance is a critical factor for runners, and both shoes deliver impressive features. The ASICS GT-2000 14 is equipped with a trampoline-inspired outsole pod, promoting energy return during toe-off, which can help improve running efficiency. It also includes Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which is about 65% softer than standard GEL, enhancing overall cushioning. The Brooks Ghost Max 3, while lacking specific performance metrics, is designed to accommodate orthotics and provide a responsive feel thanks to its EVA insole and rubber outsole. Runners seeking maximum energy return may find the ASICS model more beneficial.
Weight and Breathability
Breathability and weight are essential considerations for running shoes. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14, with its woven mesh upper, is designed to promote airflow, keeping feet cool during long runs. While specific weight details are not provided, the breathable construction usually results in a lighter feel. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, while also low-top, features a nylon lining that may not offer the same level of breathability as the ASICS model. Therefore, if breathability is a priority, the GT-2000 14 might have the edge.
Price Comparison
This section highlights the significant price difference between the two models. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 is priced at $139.95, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 comes in at $159.95. This makes the ASICS model about $20 cheaper, which is an important consideration for many buyers. When comparing performance and comfort features, the price difference might sway budget-conscious runners towards the ASICS model, especially given its strong performance attributes.
Customer Feedback and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 holds a sales rank of 13,452, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 ranks much higher at 2,293. This suggests that the Brooks model may be more favored among consumers, potentially due to its reputation for comfort and fit. However, the ASICS model also has a solid following, particularly among those who value its stability features. Customer feedback can provide valuable insights, and it's worth considering individual preferences when evaluating popularity.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize a lower price, breathability, and advanced stability features, the ASICS model may be the better choice for you. However, if you are looking for a shoe with a sleek design, good comfort, and a higher popularity rating, the Brooks Ghost Max 3 could be more appealing. Consider your running style, budget, and personal preferences to make the best decision for your feet.

