ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on comfort and breathability, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on cushioning.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers advanced stability features, while the Brooks Glycerin 21 excels in cushioning and comfort. Choose based on your running needs.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better
Stability
ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability.
Cushioning
ASICS uses rearfoot PureGEL technology for better energy return.
Breathability
ASICS has a woven mesh upper for superior moisture management.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is approximately 17% cheaper than ASICS.
Softness
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning for supreme softness.
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities beyond running.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-2000 14 | Glycerin 21 |
| Upper | Woven Mesh | Warp Knit |
| Cushioning | PureGEL | DNA Loft v3 |
| Support | 3D GUIDANCE | Neutral |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $139.95, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe is available for $114.95. This makes the Brooks option about 17% cheaper than the ASICS shoes. The price difference may be a significant factor for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes. Given that both shoes offer unique features, potential buyers will need to weigh the benefits against the cost to determine which pair aligns best with their running preferences.
Comfort and Fit
The ASICS GT-2000 14 is designed with a woven mesh upper that helps keep feet dry, while the Brooks Glycerin 21 focuses on offering supreme softness with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning. Each shoe emphasizes comfort but caters to different preferences. The ASICS features a comfortable and secure fit around the midfoot, thanks to its asymmetric tongue wing, while Brooks introduces a plush internal fit with an accommodating stretch bootie that moves with your stride. Both models provide unique comfort features, appealing to their respective target audiences.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is a highlight of both running shoes. The ASICS GT-2000 14 employs a trampoline-inspired outsole pod and rearfoot PureGEL technology, providing enhanced energy return and cushioning softness. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 21 boasts super-soft nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which promises a lightweight and responsive feel. While ASICS emphasizes stability and energy return, Brooks prioritizes a plush and luxurious running experience. The choice here depends on whether a runner prioritizes energy efficiency or cushioning softness during their runs.
Stability and Support
When it comes to stability, the ASICS GT-2000 14 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to individual needs for on-demand stability. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require additional support during their runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin 21 offers neutral support and is ideal for runners seeking maximum cushioning without additional stability features. While both shoes are designed with specific support needs in mind, the ASICS may be more suitable for those requiring enhanced stability.
Breathability
Breathability is crucial for runners, and both shoes address this aspect effectively. The ASICS GT-2000 14 incorporates a woven mesh upper that promotes airflow and helps keep feet dry during runs. Similarly, the Brooks Glycerin 21 features a newly engineered warp knit upper that is both breathable and flexible. While both shoes aim to keep your feet comfortable and cool, runners might prefer the ASICS if they prioritize moisture management, whereas the Brooks may attract those looking for a softer upper feel.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS GT-2000 14 is offered in a striking Twilight Blue/White color combination, which may appeal to those looking for a vibrant style. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin 21 comes in a classic Black/Grey/White palette, making it a versatile choice for various outfits. While aesthetics are subjective, the ASICS may attract those who prefer bold colors, while the Brooks might be favored by those who appreciate a more understated look. Ultimately, personal taste will play a significant role in this comparison.
Performance and Versatility
The ASICS GT-2000 14 is designed for energetic rides and supportive running experiences, making it an excellent choice for dedicated runners. Its features such as the trampoline-inspired design and adaptive stability system cater specifically to performance-oriented individuals. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin 21 is suited for a range of activities, including road running and cross-training, thanks to its neutral support and supreme cushioning. While both shoes excel in their domains, the ASICS may be more performance-driven, whereas the Brooks offers versatility for various activities.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe ultimately boils down to your specific running needs and budget. The ASICS shoes are priced at $139.95 and offer advanced stability features, making them ideal for runners requiring extra support. Alternatively, the Brooks option provides a plush, soft experience for $114.95, which is approximately 17% less expensive. If your priority is cushioning and versatility, the Brooks may be the better option. However, if you value stability and performance, the ASICS could be worth the investment.

