ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on comfort and breathability, Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on style.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers superior stability and performance for serious runners, while the Brooks Women's Revel 7 is a budget-friendly, versatile option for casual use.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better
Performance
ASICS has advanced stability features.
Comfort
ASICS provides a more supportive fit.
Brand Reputation
ASICS has a higher bestseller rank.
Why Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities.
Weight
Brooks is lighter for casual wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, | Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Current Price | $139.95 | $74.95 |
| Sales Rank | 13452 | 19777 |
| Upper Material | Woven Mesh | Knit |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST MAX | DNA Midsole |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes retail for $139.95, while the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe is priced at $74.95, making the Brooks about 46% cheaper. This significant price difference might attract budget-conscious shoppers or those who are looking to invest in a versatile running shoe without breaking the bank. Despite the lower price, the Brooks shoe offers a range of features that may appeal to a wide array of runners, showcasing that a lower price does not necessarily mean a lack of quality.
Brand Reputation
ASICS and Brooks are both reputable brands in the running shoe market. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 has a bestseller rank of 13,452, indicating its popularity and acceptance among runners. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 has a sales rank of 19,777, suggesting it is also well-regarded but perhaps not as prominent in sales relative to ASICS. This could influence buyers who prioritize brand recognition and proven track records in performance, especially in competitive environments.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a stylish Twilight Blue and White color scheme, while the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 comes in a more understated Oyster Mushroom and Primer Gray. The design of both shoes caters to different preferences; ASICS emphasizes a vibrant look that could appeal to those wanting to make a statement, whereas Brooks offers a sleek and versatile appearance suitable for multiple settings beyond just running. The choice in design may ultimately depend on individual style preferences.
Comfort and Fit
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 places a strong emphasis on comfort with features like a woven mesh upper that promotes breathability and a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 incorporates adaptable DNA midsole cushioning, which reacts to the runner’s stride, weight, and speed. While both shoes aim to enhance comfort, ASICS' design focuses on stability and support, while Brooks targets a more personalized cushioning experience. Runners should consider their specific comfort needs when choosing between these two options.
Performance Features
Performance-wise, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 boasts a trampoline-inspired outsole pod that enhances energy return, making it ideal for those seeking a dynamic running experience. It also includes Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which offers a softer landing. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 is designed for a responsive feel, providing enhanced energy return throughout various activities. Both shoes offer unique benefits tailored to different running styles, with ASICS leaning towards stability and Brooks favoring versatility and responsiveness.
Versatility
The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 is designed as a versatile shoe suitable for workouts, weekends, and casual outings, making it a great option for those who want a shoe that can transition seamlessly between activities. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14, while also suitable for running, leans more towards providing a specialized running experience due to its advanced stability features. For those who prioritize versatility in their footwear, the Brooks option may hold a distinct advantage.
Durability and Construction
Durability is an essential factor for runners, and both the ASICS Women’s GT-2000 14 and Brooks Women’s Revel 7 are constructed with quality materials. The ASICS shoe features a woven mesh upper and a synthetic rubber outsole, which contribute to its longevity. The Brooks shoe also boasts an updated knit upper that combines structure with breathability. While both shoes are built to last, the choice may depend on the specific conditions in which they will be used, such as road running versus varied terrain.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 will depend on your specific needs as a runner. If you're seeking a high-performance shoe focused on stability and support for serious running, the ASICS option may be worth the investment at $139.95. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly, versatile shoe for a variety of activities, the Brooks at $74.95 offers excellent value. Consider your running style, comfort preferences, and budget to make the best choice for you.

