vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on breathability, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running wins on fit and support.

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav offers better value and comfort, while the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 excels in stability and performance.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better

Price

ASICS is significantly more expensive.

Stability

ASICS offers advanced stability features.

Energy Return

ASICS has a trampoline-inspired outsole.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better

Affordability

New Balance is more budget-friendly.

Comfort

New Balance features a soft bootie construction.

Popularity

New Balance has a higher sales rank.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,
75
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
CushioningFF BLAST MAXFresh Foam
OutsoleTrampoline PodNDurance
UpperWoven MeshBootie
Sales Rank134522101
Arch SupportStandardRemovable

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running

Pricing Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe is significantly more affordable than the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes. The Roav is priced at $79.99, while the GT-2000 14 costs $139.95. This means the ASICS shoes are about 75% more expensive than the New Balance option. For budget-conscious consumers or those looking for a reliable running shoe without breaking the bank, the Fresh Foam Roav offers considerable savings.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort and fit, both shoes provide unique features tailored to enhance the running experience. The ASICS GT-2000 14 boasts a woven mesh upper that helps keep feet dry and includes a tongue feature for a secure fit. Meanwhile, the New Balance Roav features a bootie construction that wraps around the foot, providing a soft, sock-like feel. ASICS emphasizes comfort with its updated FF BLAST MAX cushioning, while New Balance uses a fresh foam midsole for plush cushioning. Both shoes cater to comfort, but the ASICS model focuses more on stability and support.

Design and Aesthetics

The visual appeal of both shoes is subjective but noteworthy. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 is available in a Twilight Blue/White color scheme, offering a sporty yet classic look. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav comes in a sleek Black/Light Aluminum combination, which may appeal to those preferring a more understated aesthetic. Ultimately, the choice between the two could come down to personal style, with both brands providing attractive options for runners.

Performance Features

When it comes to performance, the ASICS GT-2000 14 stands out with its trampoline-inspired outsole pod designed for energy return during toe-off. This technology aims to enhance performance over longer distances. On the other hand, the New Balance Roav's NDurance outsole technology is built to withstand road miles and daily wear, emphasizing durability. While the ASICS model focuses on energy return for enhanced runs, the Roav prioritizes longevity, making it suitable for both casual and serious runners.

Durability

Durability is a critical factor for running shoes, and both models offer features aimed at lasting through extensive use. The ASICS GT-2000 14 includes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability, which can contribute to its longevity. The New Balance Roav leverages NDurance technology in its outsole, designed specifically to handle wear and tear from road running. While both shoes have durability in mind, the New Balance model is particularly noted for its suitability for everyday wear, making it a versatile choice for various activities.

Weight and Agility

Weight can significantly impact running performance, and here the New Balance Roav has an edge. Although specific weights are not provided, the bootie construction of the Roav typically results in a lighter feel, which can enhance agility during runs. The ASICS GT-2000 14, while supportive, may feel bulkier due to its emphasis on stability features. Runners looking for a lightweight option that allows for quicker movements may prefer the New Balance model.

User Reviews and Popularity

The popularity of both shoes is reflected in their sales ranks; the ASICS GT-2000 14 ranks at 13,452, while the New Balance Roav ranks significantly higher at 2,101. This suggests that the Roav is favored among consumers, possibly due to its balance of comfort, price, and performance. The higher sales rank of the New Balance model indicates a strong user preference, which could be an important consideration for potential buyers looking for a well-reviewed shoe.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize budget and a lightweight feel, the New Balance Roav, priced at $79.99 with a higher sales rank, is a compelling option. However, if you seek advanced stability and energy return during runs, the ASICS GT-2000 14, despite its higher price of $139.95, may be worth the investment. Consider your running style, comfort preferences, and budget to make the best choice for your footwear needs.