ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on style and cushioning, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on breathability.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers better stability and support, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is more budget-friendly with superior cushioning.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better
Stability
3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM provides adaptive stability.
Sales Rank
Higher bestseller rank indicates better market performance.
Cushioning
FF BLAST MAX cushioning offers energized ride.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Price
Saucony Triumph 22 is $20 cheaper.
Cushioning
PWRRUN+ foam delivers superior shock absorption.
Upper Fit
Engineered mesh adapts better to foot shape.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | GT-2000 14 | Triumph 22 |
| Weight | Light | Light |
| Upper Material | Woven Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | High-abrasion Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes retail for $139.95, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker is priced at $119.95. This makes the Saucony option about 17% cheaper. The difference in price can be a significant factor for many runners, especially those who prioritize budget without sacrificing quality. While both shoes offer excellent features suited for running, the lower price of the Saucony may appeal to those looking for value in their purchase.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker is designed with plush PWRRUN+ foam that delivers maximum cushioning and superior shock absorption, making it ideal for long runs and all-day wear. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a trampoline-inspired outsole pod and updated FF BLAST MAX cushioning for an energized ride. While both shoes excel in comfort, the Triumph 22 may provide a softer, more cushioned experience for extended use, which could be beneficial during long-distance runs.
Upper Construction
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 utilizes a woven mesh upper, designed to enhance breathability and keep feet dry during runs. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 incorporates a breathable engineered mesh that adapts to the foot for a secure fit while reducing hot spots. Both designs prioritize airflow and comfort, but the engineered mesh of the Triumph 22 may offer a more adaptive feel, which can be critical for runners who experience discomfort from traditional fits.
Stability and Support
Stability is a key feature in running shoes, and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 stands out with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, providing adaptive stability through controlled deformation. This makes it an excellent choice for runners who require extra support. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is categorized as a neutral running shoe, designed for smooth transitions and a stable platform. While both shoes cater to different needs in stability, the GT-2000 14 may be more suitable for those who need additional support during their runs.
Outsole Performance
In terms of outsole performance, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a synthetic rubber outsole that provides durability and traction. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22 boasts a high-abrasion rubber outsole for long-lasting durability and reliable grip on various surfaces. Both outsoles are designed to withstand wear and provide dependable traction, but the GT-2000 14 may have a slight edge in terms of cushioning through its trampoline-inspired design, which could enhance performance during toe-off.
Style and Design
For style-conscious runners, both the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 offer modern aesthetics. The GT-2000 14 comes in a Twilight Blue/White color scheme, while the Triumph 22 is available in a Vapor/Moon combination. The choice between the two may ultimately depend on personal preference, but both options are appealing for their contemporary designs. A stylish look can be an important consideration for runners who enjoy wearing their shoes beyond just workouts.
Brand Reputation
ASICS and Saucony are both reputable brands in the running shoe market. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 has a bestseller rank of 13,452, indicating a solid performance among consumers. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 has a bestseller rank of 34,383, suggesting it may not be as widely recognized in the current market. Brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, and ASICS may have a slight advantage in this area due to its higher sales rank.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker ultimately depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you're looking for a more economical option with excellent cushioning for daily training, the Saucony Triumph 22 is a compelling choice at $119.95. However, if you require enhanced stability and support during your runs, the ASICS GT-2000 14, priced at $139.95, may be worth the investment. Each shoe brings distinct advantages to the table, so weigh your priorities carefully before making a decision.

