ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, wins on breathability, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running wins on cushioning and weight.
The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 offers a more budget-friendly option with innovative technology, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 excels in cushioning and lightweight design.
Why ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Price
ASICS is $25 cheaper
Design
ASICS has bold colors
Technology
ASICS features GUIDESOLE technology
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running is better
Cushioning
New Balance has Fresh Foam X midsole
Weight
New Balance is lighter at 241 grams
Fit
New Balance has a gusseted tongue for better lockdown
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Model | Noosa TRI 16 | Fresh Foam X More V6 |
| Cushion Type | FF BLAST PLUS | Fresh Foam X |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Synthetic |
| Reflective | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes are priced at $134.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running Shoe, which retails for $159.95. Price can often be a deciding factor for many buyers, and in this case, the ASICS model offers a more budget-friendly option without compromising on quality. The difference in price may appeal to runners looking for performance shoes without breaking the bank.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running Shoe excels with its Fresh Foam X midsole, which provides an incredibly cushioned experience. This design is ideal for runners who prioritize comfort during long runs. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, which ensures soft impact absorption while remaining lightweight. Both shoes offer excellent cushioning, but the New Balance may have the edge for those who seek an ultra-soft feel underfoot.
Weight and Breathability
The New Balance model weighs in at only 241 grams (8.5 oz), making it a lightweight option that won't weigh you down during runs. This is particularly advantageous for those who prefer a barely-there feel while running. Conversely, the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 also emphasizes breathability with its mesh upper, which helps keep feet cool and comfortable. While both shoes are designed for breathability, the New Balance's lighter weight may make it a more appealing choice for speed-focused runners.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, both shoes have their unique appeal. The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 showcases bold colors and patterns, which may attract those who appreciate a vibrant look. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 comes in a more subdued color palette of Sea Salt, Lab Green, and Frosted Glass, appealing to those who prefer a more understated aesthetic. The choice comes down to personal preference, but both models feature a stylish design that can easily transition from runs to casual wear.
Technology and Features
The ASICS model incorporates GUIDESOLE technology, aimed at enhancing energy savings and providing a smoother toe-off. This technology can be a significant advantage for runners looking for efficiency in their stride. In comparison, the New Balance shoe includes strategically placed reflective details, which enhance visibility during early morning or evening runs—an important safety feature for many runners. Each shoe brings unique technological benefits to the table, catering to different priorities among runners.
Fit and Lockdown
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 offers a gusseted tongue design, ensuring a comfortable and secure lockdown fit. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who want to avoid any slippage during their runs. The ASICS Noosa TRI 16 also offers a secure fit with its lace-up design but does not specifically mention any additional features aimed at lockdown. For those who prioritize a snug fit, the New Balance may be the better option.
Performance and Versatility
Both the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 are versatile choices suitable for various types of runs. The ASICS shoe is designed for everyday runs and training sessions, while the New Balance model is marketed as excellent for any activity, be it running or casual wear. Their performance in different scenarios will largely depend on personal preference and specific running styles, but both are well-regarded in the running community, as evidenced by their sales ranks of 22,313 and 25,188 respectively.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 ultimately depends on your personal priorities as a runner. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option with vibrant designs and innovative energy-saving technology, the ASICS may be the way to go. However, if your focus is on maximum cushioning, lightweight design, and safety features for evening runs, the New Balance could be the better choice. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider what aspects matter most to you before making a decision.

