ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl leads on breathability and traction.
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 offers advanced energy-return technology and a stylish design, while the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 provides plush comfort at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl is better
Price
ASICS is more expensive but offers advanced features.
Cushioning
ASICS uses FF BLAST™ MAX for energetic rides.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 7224.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral is better
Price
Brooks is cheaper at $114.95.
Comfort
Brooks offers a more adaptive fit.
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl | Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Cushion Type | FF BLAST™ MAX | DNA Tuned |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Flat Knit |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Support Type | Neutral | Neutral |
| Terrain | Road | Road/Cross-Training |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes retail for $149.95, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral Running Shoe is priced at $114.95. This makes the Brooks shoe about 23% cheaper than the ASICS model. For budget-conscious shoppers, the lower price of the Brooks option could be a significant factor in their decision-making process. Despite the price difference, both shoes offer unique features that cater to different running styles and preferences, making it essential to consider more than just cost.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 features a visually appealing Pearl Pink/Morganite color combination, making it a stylish choice for runners who value aesthetics. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 comes in a classic White/Grey/Black scheme, offering a more understated look. The design of the ASICS includes a breathable engineered jacquard mesh upper, while the Brooks model boasts an updated flat knit upper that provides both stretch and compression. Both designs have their merits, but the choice largely depends on personal style preference.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is crucial for runners, and both shoes excel in this area but in different ways. The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 features a tongue wing construction that enhances fit and reduces tongue movement, contributing to overall comfort during runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 emphasizes an accommodating fit with its soft, flat knit upper that adapts to the foot's shape. This difference indicates that while both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS may offer a more secure fit, whereas the Brooks provides a more adaptive experience.
Cushioning Technology
When it comes to cushioning, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 utilizes FF BLAST™ MAX cushioning to deliver a lightweight and energetic ride, enhancing the running experience through softer landings and responsive toe-offs. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 incorporates DNA Tuned technology, ensuring plush landings with larger cells in the heel and responsive toe-offs with smaller cells in the forefoot. Both cushioning systems are designed to improve performance, but the ASICS focuses on energy return, while the Brooks prioritizes plush comfort.
Traction and Stability
Traction is vital for safety and performance, and the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 uses AHAR® LO outsole rubber, which enhances traction and softness for various terrains. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 features a broad platform that stabilizes the foot and smooths transitions from heel to toe. This stability could be especially appealing to runners who prioritize a secure feel. Both shoes offer unique solutions for traction, but the decision may depend on the terrain where the shoes will primarily be used.
Performance and Versatility
Performance is a key consideration for any running shoe. The ASICS NOVABLAST 5, with its trampoline-inspired outsole design, provides a responsive bounce back, making it suitable for various running styles. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is designed for neutral support, making it versatile enough for road running, cross-training, or gym workouts. While both shoes cater to different types of runners, the ASICS may be better suited for those seeking a more energetic running experience, while the Brooks appeals to those looking for an all-around performer.
Sales Ranking
Sales rank can provide insight into the popularity of a product. The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 holds a sales rank of 7224, making it a well-regarded choice among consumers. In comparison, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 has a sales rank of 14424. While both shoes are popular, the ASICS model appears to have a stronger presence in the market. This difference might indicate that more runners prefer the ASICS for their needs, although individual preferences can vary widely.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 comes down to personal priorities. If you're looking for a shoe with advanced energy-return technology and a stylish design, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is a compelling choice despite its higher price of $149.95. However, if budget considerations are paramount alongside a focus on plush comfort and versatility, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22, priced at $114.95, offers a fantastic alternative. Ultimately, both shoes have their strengths, and your decision should align with your running style, terrain preferences, and aesthetic tastes.

